Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VOTE ON TERROR RULES DEFIES BUSH (GOP-led panel gives detainees more protections)
The Houston Chronicle via The NY Times ^ | 9/14/06 | KATE ZERNIKE

Posted on 09/15/2006 5:03:46 AM PDT by demkicker

WASHINGTON - On a frantic day of Republican infighting, the Senate Armed Services Committee defied President Bush on Thursday as four Republicans joined Democrats in approving a plan for the trial and interrogation of terror suspects that the White House has rejected.

The Republican rebellion was led by Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the committee chairman, with backing from Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine. The White House had warned that their legislation would leave the United States no option but to shut down a CIA program to interrogate high-level terror suspects.

The vote came despite an all-out effort by the White House to win support for its own approach, which provides far fewer protections for detainees. Bush himself traveled to Capitol Hill with Vice President Dick Cheney on Thursday morning, and the administration released a brief letter in which the top lawyers for the military branches said they did not object to the White House proposal to redefine a key provision of the Geneva Conventions.

But former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell sided with the senators, saying in a letter that Bush's plan to redefine the Geneva Conventions would encourage the world to "doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism" and "put our own troops at risk."

Powell's statement amounted to a rare public breach with the White House he served, but reflected his opposition while in office to the administration's assertions that the war against al-Qaida should not be bound by the Geneva Conventions.... (continued at link)

(Excerpt) Read more at houstonchronicle.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
I consider this nothing short of a coup attempt by McCain, Warner, Graham and Collins with the help of Colin Powell to weaken our President, the Republican party and the United States efforts fighting the war on terror.

If you agree and are as outraged as I am, let your voices be heard! The DBM are delighted to spread this bad news to damage the Bush administration, our war on terror efforts and the Republican Party before the Nov elections. Don't be silent!

1 posted on 09/15/2006 5:03:47 AM PDT by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Here's the thing the democratic party has morphed into the socialist party and the republicans have morphed into great society democrats. Oh where oh where have the republicans gone?

Save us big government!


2 posted on 09/15/2006 5:09:20 AM PDT by RunningJoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

They are out of touch. Warner, especially, surprises me. Our local NBC station, which broadcasts in the pretty liberal Maryland-DC-Northern Virginia area, ran a web poll yesterday that showed that viewers support tough interrogation of terrorist suspects, 71% to 29%.


3 posted on 09/15/2006 5:11:02 AM PDT by Ex-Dem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee; governsleastgovernsbest; ZULU; Peach; Howlin; beansox; MNJohnnie; American Quilter

Ping... Some major triangulation going on here!


4 posted on 09/15/2006 5:13:02 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem

The Geneva Convention shouldn't even apply to terrorists anyway as they aren't representative of any particular country and don't even wear uniforms for cryin' out loud!

This is so crazy, I cannot even believe it!


5 posted on 09/15/2006 5:15:03 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

When one looks at the senate members involved one knows which side they are on. Americans in this great nation are now more vulnerable to being killed by terrorists, thanks to our US Senate. Should Americans declare war on the US Senate, for Americans own protection?


6 posted on 09/15/2006 5:15:48 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker
McCain, Graham and the other two dufuses just made our country less safe. I guess when we get attacked again, I'll have to remind them that they mad it easier for the terrorist to do it because of this vote. To which, McCain and Graham will say "well...that would have allowed our the CIA to make the detainees less comfortable."

Lord Help Us!
7 posted on 09/15/2006 5:15:54 AM PDT by Arcy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker
Bush needs to veto this crap.

Captured terrorists should not be pampered. Redefining torture as anything that makes prisoners uncomfortable is insane.

Terrorist should not even qualify for the Geneva Convention protections. They are not soldiers. They do not fight by the Geneva Conventions and therefore should not be protected by them.

8 posted on 09/15/2006 5:16:37 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Time to add a little something extra to your tagline, I'm thinking...


9 posted on 09/15/2006 5:17:14 AM PDT by Ex-Dem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Once upon a time, I supported Lindsey Graham. And while my respect for him has teetered on the edge for the past few years, it has now vanished.

Congratulations, Lindsey, your adept leadership during clinton's impeachment process is now fully overshadowed.

Lindsey: how the hell do you square your usual support for our armed forces and our nation with such a vote? HOW? Tell us HOW, Lindsey?


10 posted on 09/15/2006 5:19:00 AM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo (DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From One - Many

I like that idea, war on the Senate.

Where do I sign up?


11 posted on 09/15/2006 5:19:27 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem

Great suggestion.... Done!


12 posted on 09/15/2006 5:19:27 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats, terrorists, Powell, McCain, Graham & Collins are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

If any of my family members are injured or killed in a terrorist attack, I will issue a personal jihad on these SOB senators.


13 posted on 09/15/2006 5:19:54 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem

Warner needs to go. I think he's gone senile.


14 posted on 09/15/2006 5:21:03 AM PDT by VA40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

I can't believe it either. And if the Republican leadership had risen up and given press interviews about how insane the SCOTUS ruling was (giving jihadists GC protection), maybe public pressure would have effected a different outcome in Congress than the one we're facing now.

And on another note: Lindsey Graham thinks detainees should have access to classified information in their defense.


15 posted on 09/15/2006 5:21:10 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

see Blam below.


16 posted on 09/15/2006 5:22:07 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: demkicker
But former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell sided with the senators, saying in a letter that Bush's plan to redefine the Geneva Conventions would encourage the world to "doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism" and "put our own troops at risk."

How idiotic is this? Does this man really believe that the terrorists are going to pause less danger to us if we abide by the Geneva Convention in our treatment to captured terrorists

17 posted on 09/15/2006 5:22:19 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arcy; From One - Many

These idiots really want us to believe that the terrorists subscribe to the Geneva Convention and any changes we make will put our military in worse peril than getting chopped up and beheaded!


18 posted on 09/15/2006 5:23:21 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats, terrorists, Powell, McCain, Graham & Collins are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: demkicker
I consider this nothing short of a coup attempt by McCain, Warner, Graham and Collins with the help of Colin Powell to weaken our President, the Republican party and the United States efforts fighting the war on terror.

That's a little bit much, don't you think? There's a reasonable case to be made for their side. Namely, this:

"We are the United States of America after all; we don't need to resort to terrorist tactics to win. We are in an ideological war with al-Qa'ida. Sticking to our ideals is important."

Now, I don't really lose much sleep at night over what happens to terrorists, but I have a hard time refuting this arguement when it's posed to me.

19 posted on 09/15/2006 5:24:45 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

I'm sure our men in the field fighting 7th century wantabee barbarians feel better knowing that the perfumed princes in the U.S. Senate have made them safer. If captured, the thugs might now think for .002 seconds about their captives rights under the Geneva Conventions before sawing their head off.


20 posted on 09/15/2006 5:25:13 AM PDT by PogySailor (Media bias? What media bias?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson