Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
Dibold is not involved in running the country, nor are they concerned with the security of the software.

Government is.

Dibold sold them what they asked for.

65 posted on 09/15/2006 6:32:25 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
nor are they concerned with the security of the software.

That's obvious. Me buying a book at Amazon has more inherent security, yet that's not really an important thing on a grand scale compared to, say, who will be the next leader of the free world. It's kind of obvious to this programer that you might just want to up your security on the system when programming for something so sensitive.

Dibold sold them what they asked for.

Yes, sad. OTOH, in some cases governments asked for accountability and code visibility, and Diebold sued, and won, to avoid the laws. Diebold also violated other laws relating to certification of the machines, like installing software after the certification.

72 posted on 09/15/2006 6:47:10 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson