To: .cnI redruM
[Walmart] has one-fifth of the nation's grocery business . . . People who buy their groceries from Wal-Mart . . . save at least 17 percent . . .
The big-hearted progressives on Chicago's City Council . . . have passed a bill that . . . would [have] keep Wal-Marts from locating in the city.
Didn't I hear somewhere that it was a big scandal that poor people in inner cities pay higher prices and than people in the suburbs do?
15 posted on
09/14/2006 6:06:23 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Yeah, that sucking sound you here is $M of sales tax revenue leaving urban Chicago.
17 posted on
09/14/2006 6:09:15 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(Tom Cruise to Pluto: Welcome to the club!)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Didn't I hear somewhere that it was a big scandal that poor people in inner cities pay higher prices and than people in the suburbs do? Big scandal? I dunno. It's always been true. Retailers say it's to make up for the higher rate of shoplifting and vandalism, which seemed fair to me. Even when I lived in one of those neighborhoods and paid higher or drove out of town.
19 posted on
09/14/2006 6:12:01 AM PDT by
prion
(Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson