To: msnimje
46% of R.I Republicans felt supporting a LIBERAL was not good enough for the party. If we're afraid to articulate our principles in Blue States and stand up for them, we won't get respect. People in those liberal strongholds will continue to vote for the real liberals, the Democrats. And they would be right since a RINO GOP is no improvement on the status quo.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
6 posted on
09/13/2006 10:56:03 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Meanwhile, in the real world, this is how things are now.
If you want to change it you have to go to Rhode Island, find a Ronald Reagan clone, support him for several years and get him elected to the Senate.
14 posted on
09/13/2006 11:08:13 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: goldstategop
46% of R.I Republicans felt supporting a LIBERAL was not good enough for the party.
In the primary? Election day voters are not the same breed as people who vote in primaries, especially mid-term primaries.
17 posted on
09/13/2006 11:12:46 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: goldstategop; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; JohnnyZ; AntiGuv
I disagree that it was 46%. Clearly the rodents flooded the primary, so I'd say a majority of RI Republicans voted against the Hillary Clinton RINO clone.
Maybe it's time we went back to nominating our people at party caucuses.
54 posted on
09/14/2006 4:27:31 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson