Your friends in Wikipedia provide sufficient information...Yes they do, but no part of my quote is from Wikipedia. The quote concerning evolution is from Douglas J. Futuyma in Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates 1986.
But Wiki does provide a partial bibliography for Futuyma.
Books
- Futuyma, D.J. 1979. Evolutionary Biology. 1st ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. ISBN 0-87893-199-6 Futuyma, D.J. 1983. Science on Trial: the Case for Evolution. 1st ed. Pantheon Books, New York. ISBN 0-394-52371-7
- Futuyma, D.J. & M. Slatkin, eds. 1983. Coevolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. ISBN 0-87893-228-3
- Futuyma, D.J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. ISBN 0-87893-188-0 Futuyma, D.J. 1995. Science on Trial: the Case for Evolution. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. ISBN 0-87893-184-8
- Futuyma, D.J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. (dated 1998, published 1997) ISBN 0-87893-189-9
- Futuyma, D.J. 2005. Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. ISBN 0-87893-187-2
Papers
- 1996: with C. Mitter. "Insect-plant interactions: The evolution of component communities" (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 351:13611366)
- 1995: "The uses of evolutionary biology" (Science 267: 4142)
- 1995: with M.C. Keese and D.J. Funk. "Genetic constraints on macroevolution: The evolution of host affiliation in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella" (Evolution 49:797809)
- 1992: with M. C. Keese. "Evolution and coevolution of plants and phytophagous arthropods" (in G.A. Rosenthal and M.R. Berenbaum (edd) Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites (2nd ed.) Academic Press, NY. pp 439475)
- 1987: "On the role of species in anagenesis" (Amer. Natur. 130: 465473)
But compared to you, he knows nothing about evolution.
I didn't say he didn't know anything about evolution. I merely pointed out that your friends at Wiki decided to explain the man by first identifying his anti-creationism book.
That's what he's really known for now. Whatever science he's done, that's obviously in the past. Now he's one of us.