They're = their. LOL!
"The ultimate goal of science is discovering the truth..."
I was talking about Darwinists' ultimate goals, not science's. I do not consider evolution science, nor Darwinists scientists as in the sense of hard science scientists.
"Science just happens not to care about political correctness, religious correctness, or anybody's personal feelings, for that matter."
True. And, since evolution is not science (either soft or hard), they may care about those attributes. In fact, for the most part, evolution revolves around those and other pseudo, intangible concepts to make their shoe fit.
On whose decree, yours? The decree of "Lone Rangers of Science" that publish their own (frequently flawed) opinions on websites? Funny that just about all biological scientists fail to see it your way. Peer-reviewed literature and field research tells quite a different story.
Before people become speakers as to what is science and what isn't, they should first spend some time in the audience.
Which "Darwinists" are not scientists?
Paleontologists and paleoanthropologists, who find fossils, then analyze and publish their results.
Geologists, geochemists and nuclear chemists who help date the fossils.
Geneticists who compare the genomes of various species to determine relationships.
Or any number of other specialists who work contributes to the overall theory of evolution.
So, who are these non-scientist "Darwinists" you are talking about?