Might try that statement over.
Um, no. No one in their right mind believes. Anyone who knows anything about evolution knows it has definite constraints. If it didn't, physical data would be useless in our research into the subject.
My statement is accurate. Creationists seem to think that data is open to any 'interpretation' they can dream up, and that reading a few websites or pop science books gives them more insight into the subject than the teams of PhD's and technical researchers specifically trained to deal with the subject.
It's not just creationists that do this. There's all sorts of loons and cranks out there. None of it should try to seriously pass itself off as science.
Rules of grammar help us get through the obfuscation.