Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Suzy Quzy
...There is NO science behind evolution!! ...

Then why is it able to make true predictions about lab and field results? EG the Tiktaalik find, or the verification of Darwin's prediction of pre-Cambrian fossils?ToE claimed that mammals evolved from reptiles, and that birds evolved from dinosaurs; after these claims were made, many fossils of just such intermediate forms were found, and none that link birds more directly to mammals, or mammals to dinos.

Are yuo seriously claiming this is just luck? fraud? Why can't ID or creationism make predictions like these, predictions that turn out to be true?

338 posted on 09/13/2006 9:46:12 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia-American

They CLAIMED all that!! Where is the GRADUAl CHANGING EVIDENCE of EVOLUTION??? Hint...it doesn't exist except in viruses.


347 posted on 09/13/2006 10:02:07 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia-American

LOL ..show me where Darwin predicted the pre cambrian fossils........this discovery is major evidence against Darwin!


349 posted on 09/13/2006 10:07:56 PM PDT by caffe (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia-American
The Tiktaalik critter had some surprises. Not everything was predicted, and some things that were predicted hadn't happened.

The only legitimate claim is that there should have been an "in between critter" at some point, and there he is.

373 posted on 09/14/2006 3:28:22 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson