Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Suzy Quzy
and besides, there is NO evidence of the process of evolving....anywhere.

False. The example of flu virus mutations was given in the post before yours. Are you going to graciously accept last year's flu shot, or the one from the year before because you don't believe anything evolves?

Then there is this: This is a transitional. Note its position in the chart which follows (hint--in the upper center). Evolution occurred between these various species. You may not believe it, but scientists do and it is their opinions which count.



Fossil: KNM-ER 3733

Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)

Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)

Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)

Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)

Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)

Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)

Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406 A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)

Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)

See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33


Source: http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/environment/eePages/eeDating/HumanEvol_info.html

254 posted on 09/13/2006 7:09:51 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

Posted three days ago by coyoteman--placemarker


266 posted on 09/13/2006 7:23:53 PM PDT by Mamzelle (((nobody likes spam)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

Come on!! DRAWINGS??? you can do better right???


337 posted on 09/13/2006 9:44:26 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman; Suzy Quzy
That skull might be a transitional in your flow chart with all its 'best guess dotted lines' but that is where it ends.

That skull is nothing but a composite (they assert is 1.75 mya) 1.75 million years old, and is made up of a few hundred pieces that don't fit together all to well.

composite skull image

Just one place to start is that rear head area, another is the profile. But don't take my word for it, take the images they have as evidence, blow them up and start taking a look. Then put that in context to what they are suggesting. Then apply the most accurate dating method to the pieces, and notice the margin of error.

W.
368 posted on 09/14/2006 12:42:33 AM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson