Skip to comments.
If Only Bin Laden Had a Stained Blue Dress... (Ann Coulter)
HUMAN EVENT ^
| 09/13/2006
| By Ann Coulter
Posted on 09/13/2006 3:41:07 PM PDT by oxcart
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
LOL, what a headline!
1
posted on
09/13/2006 3:41:09 PM PDT
by
oxcart
To: oxcart
2
posted on
09/13/2006 3:43:44 PM PDT
by
TexasTransplant
(NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
To: oxcart
3
posted on
09/13/2006 3:44:34 PM PDT
by
cll
(Carthage must be destroyed)
To: oxcart
If Only Bin Laden Had a Stained Blue Dress... (Clinton would have

him)
4
posted on
09/13/2006 3:47:12 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: oxcart
Another outstanding column from Ann.
BTW, I did not know this: there was not even an indictment filed after the bombing of either Khobar Towers (1996) or the USS Cole (2000). Indictments were not filed until after Bush/Ashcroft came into office.
5
posted on
09/13/2006 3:47:49 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: oxcart
BC movie that relies on the 9/11 Commission Report, which whitewashed only 90 percent of Clinton's cowardice and incompetence in the face of terrorism, rather than 100 percent.
Tell me again who has the majority in congress
6
posted on
09/13/2006 3:47:56 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: oxcart
The "Ann Rule", you forgot about the "Ann Rule".
Every Ann thread MUST have a picture :-)
7
posted on
09/13/2006 3:48:07 PM PDT
by
Condor51
("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
To: oxcart
This is the money shot:
So don't tell me impeachment "distracted" Clinton from his aggressive pursuit of terrorists. He never would have bombed anyone if it weren't for the Clinton-haters.
So true! Must be repeated far and wide!
8
posted on
09/13/2006 3:51:22 PM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(Bill Clinton is Chief Loser)
To: oxcart
Clinton admitted to the nation that he did in fact have "sex with that woman,"
That Jenifer Flowers
Er oh wait I already did that one on TV
I mean Monica Jones
Er wait I mean Paula Lewinsky
Or whatever her name was
any way at least I didn't inhale
9
posted on
09/13/2006 3:51:48 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: oxcart
So don't tell me impeachment "distracted" Clinton from his aggressive pursuit of terrorists.This is the greatest line in Ann's column! The only time Clinton did anything about terrorism was a means to distract from his impeachment.
10
posted on
09/13/2006 3:52:26 PM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: oxcart
...classic Democrat excuses for doing nothing in response to the Cole attack: * Attorney General Janet Reno "thought retaliation might violate international law and was therefore against it." * CIA Director George Tenet "wanted more definitive proof that bin Laden was behind the attack, although he personally thought he was." * Secretary of State Madeleine Albright "was concerned about the reaction of world opinion to a retaliation against Muslims and the impact it would have in the final days of the Clinton Middle East peace process." (How did that turn out, by the way? Big success, I take it? Everybody over there all friendly with one another?) * Secretary of Defense William Cohen "did not consider the Cole attack 'sufficient provocation' for a military retaliation." Classic Ann Coulter. What I find amusing is that we knew that OBL was behind the embassy bombings in East Africa and WTC I. Why was the bombing of the USS Cole even relevant in terms of going after bin Laden? How many crimes must he commit before we go after him? If you know a fugitive is a serial murderer, why agonize over the latest crime before taking action?
11
posted on
09/13/2006 3:52:31 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: oxcart
Always fun to read. Keep writing, Ann.
12
posted on
09/13/2006 3:53:03 PM PDT
by
P.O.E.
To: oxcart
Its trademark Ann Coulter sarcasm but it conceals an important point the Democrats miss: that if Bin Laden had committed a real crime, the Democrats might have finally nailed him. Then again, perhaps not. Which shows up the deficiency in their reliance on the legal process to make us safe from terrorists.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
13
posted on
09/13/2006 3:53:52 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Condor51
That's right....rules is rules!!!!!
14
posted on
09/13/2006 3:54:05 PM PDT
by
quikdrw
(Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
To: oxcart
For a president who supposedly stayed up all night "working" and hated vacations,
He was still trying to find that middle class tax cut
15
posted on
09/13/2006 3:54:20 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: oxcart
Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew.
To: oxcart
If the pin is indeed mightier than the sword, Ann Coulter can behead in one rapid and painless stroke.
17
posted on
09/13/2006 3:57:32 PM PDT
by
billhilly
(DU Funnies pingee # 911)
To: oxcart; Ann Coulter
A return to form for Annie. Good job.
18
posted on
09/13/2006 3:58:52 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: Condor51
Every Ann thread MUST have a picture :-)
It's not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
19
posted on
09/13/2006 3:59:02 PM PDT
by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
20
posted on
09/13/2006 3:59:08 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(Colossians 2:6)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson