Posted on 09/13/2006 2:38:26 PM PDT by oxcart
Bump for later.
Obviously don't know what specific camcorder they used, but the pics look a lot like mine, bought earlier in 2001 which came out in 2000 or so -- a Sony TRV-20, a decent 1 CCD camcorder. $1200 or so new at the time. In the daylight, the differences blur between cameras.
Not cheap but probably not too fancy.
Not cheap, but typical of what you get with a digital minicam. The "edit" is an in-camera dissolve.
Would this be it?...
Good job...thank you!
I can't get the 4th track, only the first 3. Ideas?
You didn't hear that controlled demolition brought down WTC7? /sarc
Bump
Six hours later. You couldn't imagine that it was damaged during the collapse? Or that the fires were started by the collapse?
I'm no architect, but I'm pretty sure it had something to do with the two gigantic towers right next to it that came crashing down.
This consiracy crap is really annoying. It's an insult to everybody in NYC, and anybody with half a brain, that eyewitnessed commercial planes full of civilians being flown into those buildings by muslim fanatics.
Same problem here.
Whoever these people are, they're quite the rich ones; you don't get that kind of height and view in Manhattan for $500 a month. And that's a professional-quality video cam (or damn close) they were using as well, not something you'd get at Circuit City. In 2001, I doubt it could have cost them less than $2500 minimum; if it's a true pro model, it could have cost more than $50K ... potentially a lot more.
I'm in agreement with those that say "release the entire tape"; cut up as it is, particularly at the points of impact and collapse, all it's going to do is serve as more fuel for the conspiracy nuts. Even I was thinking, "What are they trying to hide?" as I watched the bad edits. If they really only wanted to protect their privacy, they could have spent an extra ten minutes or so blanking some audio or at least putting an explanation on the screen for the missing video at such crucial moments.
The audio and video have both been edited. A friend who used to work at CNN sent this to me 3 years ago in its entirety, what is strange about this version is they caught the 2nd plane hitting and sold that footage to various news outlets because it was a unique perspective but yet it is omitted in this version. You could easily tell it was a large jet coming in.
The line "it was a military plane" was lifted from when she saw the F-16 flying over and moved and placed over right after the 2nd tower was hit.
I smell moonbat all over this.
still an incredible video if you haven't seen it, the sound from the second tower collapsing is deafening.
Thanks for the imput.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.