Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stinkerpot65
A Republican was never going to win this, but a Lieberman win is one less Democrat, and one more strong supporter of the Bush foreign policy.

And furthermore, there is much less of a chance for the Dems to regain control of the Senate, since Lieberman is now an Independent.

30 posted on 09/12/2006 10:04:45 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: demlosers
And furthermore, there is much less of a chance for the Dems to regain control of the Senate, since Lieberman is now an Independent.

I would expect Lieberman would continue to caucus with the Democrats, even though he is running as an Independent. Jumpin' Jim Jeffords, for whom I am screen-named, after a fashion, is also an Independent, but he caucuses with the Democrats.

The thing is, in Primaries, you vote for the guy you want. In General Elections, you vote against the guy you don't want. We don't want Lamont, so you vote for the guy who is better than Lamont and has a chance to beat him. If the Republican candidate was not polling in the single digits, I would be enthusiastic about picking up the seat. But only one man can beat Ned Lamont, and that man is Joe Lieberman. That is why he has so much Joe-mentum going into November.

Besides, and honest old-school Liberal is not such a bad thing to have around, when compared to the collection of Moonbat Idiots who pass for the Democrat Party today.

31 posted on 09/13/2006 3:16:54 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson