Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas
AP’s own translation of the Arabic in the document indicates that all the points of information in it come from the AP wire story below, which was distributed worldwide on July 12, 2000.

Did anybody doubt that the reference was to an actual AP story? Or contend that AP had done anything wrong in distributing the article?

So, why does Ms. Wagner belabor this point?

And why does she never address the phrase that was actually at issue: We have learned from one of our sources (in whom the degree of trust is good) who works for the American news agency Associated Press...

There is a rather clear connotation here that "one of our sources" is a.) on the Iraqi payroll (or is, at least, an Iraqi sympathizer) and b.) works for AP. That would tend to make him/her a spy, would it not?

Hmmmmmmmmm. I wonder how Ms. Wagner failed to grasp this point...

12 posted on 09/12/2006 10:34:43 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

That is exactly the whole point. The AP employee spied for Saddam intelligence and the document is very clear about it. As I said AP explanation of the document is very lame and laughable.


14 posted on 09/12/2006 10:44:21 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: okie01
So, why does Ms. Wagner belabor this point?

Ssshhhhhh. Ms. Wagner's busy beating a straw man.

33 posted on 09/12/2006 8:44:26 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson