To: Mr. Brightside
I watched all of The Path to 9-11 and didn't see anything that was really democrat or Clinton bashing. I think the real "bad guy" of the movie was the government bureaucrats in all presidential administrations that are more worried about keeping their jobs and doing everything by the book than about protecting us. It was also a classical little guy in the field who knows best vs. the clueless bosses which is a pretty liberal theme if you ask me.
And I still haven't figured out what the democrats and Clinton are mad about, are they saying none of this is true, that they did get Usama when they had a chance? They need to get over themselves and admit that yes, in hindsight they should have gotten Usama when they had the chance, but hey we didn't know what he was capable of, sorry..but I don't expect that press release anytime soon..
133 posted on
09/12/2006 8:06:04 AM PDT by
pesto
To: pesto
"I think the real "bad guy" of the movie was the government bureaucrats in all presidential administrations that are more worried about keeping their jobs and doing everything by the book than about protecting us."
__________________________
Good point, but I couldn't help but notice the differences between the Clinton Admn. and Bush Admn. over how to use the Predator and GWB not needing a "presidential finding" in order to give the order to shoot down United 93. It seemed pretty clear there was a new sheriff in town.
177 posted on
09/12/2006 10:29:04 AM PDT by
wmfights
(Psalm : 27)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson