Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: Mr. Brightside
WOW man, wipe the spittle off your chin. You look like a raving lunatic. (not you Mr. Brightside)
69 posted on
09/12/2006 7:34:01 AM PDT by
McGavin999
(Richard Armitage is a sniveling COWARD!)
To: Mr. Brightside
loony left ping
70 posted on
09/12/2006 7:34:05 AM PDT by
aligncare
(In warfare, the only moral stance is to win)
To: Mr. Brightside
"Please do everything you can to spread the word about this excellent miniseries," Murty wrote, "so that The Path to 9/11 gets the highest ratings possible when it airs on September 10 & 11! If this show gets huge ratings, then ABC will be more likely to produce pro-American movies and TV shows in the future!" Encouraging people to watch...whay an appalling tactic....
***rolls eyes***
71 posted on
09/12/2006 7:34:12 AM PDT by
Samwise
(All that is needed for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing.)
To: Mr. Brightside
72 posted on
09/12/2006 7:34:58 AM PDT by
Cold Heat
(I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
To: Mr. Brightside
There is only real men left in the FreeRepublic back in America.
82 posted on
09/12/2006 7:37:10 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: Mr. Brightside
Iger now bears ultimate responsibility for authorizing the product of a well-honed propaganda operation--a network of little-known right-wingers working from within Hollywood to counter its supposedly liberal bias. Supposedly? That tells me all I need to know about this loony jackal.
I think Bill and his boot lickers are making a big mistake on this one. Do they really want the facts to start seeping from the reeking pile they consider his legacy? Keep talking, loons. We scary right wingers just love free inquiry, quite unlike you. Clintonoid tastes run more along the lines of character assassination, suppression and purges.
To: Mr. Brightside
Iger now bears ultimate responsibility for authorizing the product of a well-honed propaganda operation--a network of little-known right-wingers working from within Hollywood... The leftist McCarthyites are at it again. Looks like they have their blacklist pretty much filled out. ("I have a list...")
...bankrolled for years with millions by right-wing sugar daddies like billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife. (Scaife financed the Arkansas Project,...
I have to laugh whenever these liberal scumbags start whining about Richard Scaife and his so-called "millions" donated to "right wing causes". Cripes, how much have Soros and Lewis and the rest of the liberal 'Rat Pack donated to leftist slimemolds like MoveOn.org over the years? Probably getting close to the $50 million range by now. The payoffs from Soros alone make Scaife look like a cheapskate.
85 posted on
09/12/2006 7:37:49 AM PDT by
chimera
To: Mr. Brightside
This is HUGH! All of their writers are belong to us!
87 posted on
09/12/2006 7:40:38 AM PDT by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
To: Mr. Brightside
Besieged in his lush office, Iger privately agonizes that he was complacent about an attack on his network's reputation by a band of political terrorists. But when faced with his own version of the Taliban, he appeased them. This is just about the most slanted piece I've ever seen. Many of the facts he uses are likely true, but the way he slants his comments, and the ad hominum attacks should be considered hate speech against conservatives.
93 posted on
09/12/2006 7:43:16 AM PDT by
6ppc
(Call Photo Reuters, that's the name, and away goes truth right down the drain. Photo Reuters!)
To: Mr. Brightside
Murty followed her review with a blast e-mail to conservative websites such as... and Free RepublicHow is that accomplished? This guy sounds like a nut. Is he related to Sid?
95 posted on
09/12/2006 7:44:22 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(Aspire to inspire before you expire.)
To: Mr. Brightside
"Besieged in his lush office, Iger privately agonizes that he was complacent about an attack on his network's reputation by a band of political terrorists."
An attack on his network by political TERRORISTS? WTF!?
To: Mr. Brightside
Iger now bears ultimate responsibility for authorizing the product of a well-honed propaganda operation--a network of little-known right-wingers working from within Hollywood to counter its supposedly liberal bias.Aw, geez.
This guy is a left-wing McCarthyite.
If anyone thinks you won't be "blacklisted" in Hollywood for being a conservative, you aren't paying attention.
101 posted on
09/12/2006 7:46:07 AM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Don't mess with Israel.)
To: Mr. Brightside
It's obvious. Conservatives shouldn't be allowed to show their content on national TV. The public airwaves are reserved for liberals.
102 posted on
09/12/2006 7:46:36 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(If Clinton went after Bin Laden as hard as ABC, there would have been no 9/11)
To: Mr. Brightside
"supposedly liberal bias"
...like the "supposedly hot sun"
To: Mr. Brightside
This article is a hoot. It reads like some far left loony conspiracy theory.
I wish they would analyze the politics and associations of every screenwriter, director and actor in every film...then everyone could really see the vastly vast left wing control that has Hollywood and the rest of our old media in it's grip.
To: Mr. Brightside
Somebody needs to write a book specifically to annotate the movie.
113 posted on
09/12/2006 7:53:12 AM PDT by
Excellence
(Vote Dhimmocrat; you'll look in a burqa!)
To: Mr. Brightside
When a leftist producer or director is involved in a film, does the media go to this much trouble to discover their political ties? I really hate the left in this country.
To: Mr. Brightside
"On this project, a secretive evangelical religious right group long associated with Horowitz, founded by The Path to 9/11's director, David Cunningham, that aims to "transform Hollywood" in line with its messianic vision, has taken the lead." And then the whispering voice goes "secretive" and "e-van-gel-ical"
To: Mr. Brightside
Boy, they are still howling. I think my theory that they are more concerned about protecting the
"Narrative" gets better every day.
122 posted on
09/12/2006 7:56:55 AM PDT by
PogySailor
(Media bias? What media bias?)
To: Mr. Brightside
"Since the inauguration of Bill Clinton in 1992, Horowitz has labored to create a network of politically active conservatives in Hollywood." He sure has all his "facts" down pat.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson