Replies

So I guess Part Two did better against the two MNF games than Part One did against the Manning bowl.

4 posted on 09/12/2006 6:51:03 AM PDT by mainepatsfan

To: mainepatsfan

So I guess Part Two did better against the two MNF games than Part One did against the Manning bowl.

Some of us don't have cable and can't watch Monday night football anymore.

6 posted on 09/12/2006 6:53:58 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)

To: mainepatsfan

"So I guess Part Two did better against the two MNF games than Part One did against the Manning bowl."

That's probably because the leftists heard that part two was the portion that "bashed Bush".

I've heard Buzz Patterson on quite a few radio talk shows in the past several days, and he said that the movie lets Clinton off the hook by leaving the impression that Sandy Berger and M. Albright were responsible for why he failed to act. He also said that Wesley Clark comes off looking a lot better than what the real case was. Patterson was "there", and said he knows better in both cases.

Clinton aide says 9-11 film 'correct' {military attaché saw aborted attacks on bin Laden} HERE

27 posted on 09/12/2006 8:40:31 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (DemocRAT leaders easily confuse the minds of the simple.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794