The New York Times tempers its enthusiasm over Katie, has already seen the ratings slide, acts like it hasn't happened ("wildly successful so far") even though an intern could have found the info, and pretends to be a trend reader by suggesting that the ratings may slide due to no fault by the great MSM.
A small but typical example of how truth doesn't matter at the NYT.
After ONE week, it's already desperation time. Oh, the schadenfreude.
I'm waiting for them to start trotting out the excuses they used when Phil Donohue's ratings sank to oblivion..."Well, his target audience are still on their month-long vacations in Europe. When they get back, man, you just wait!"