As the actual un-plagerized and un-edited article points out, one person complained.
Not doubting that.
It might be like a lot of other ordinances in a lot of other places: a foregone conclusion where it wouldn't matter if 1000 complained.
The bigger question is does the state really have the right to do this? Should they? The article quotes one state guy saying to the effect that the state should have this right to "render services". You can do a lot of harm using that terminology.
"As the actual un-plagerized and un-edited article points out, one person complained."
Only one person? Oh, well, that's ok then.
They can just come in and take anything they want.
After all, only ONE person complained!
/MAJOR sarcasm