Posted on 09/11/2006 11:48:23 AM PDT by OPS4
>>As for Clinton, he didn't bother watching the movie that angered so many people who once worked for him.<<
Of course. And he didn't know about the $$$ his mother was talking about, till he read it in her book.
SHAZAM!
I wonder why?
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-NY, arrives for the Sept. 11, 2001 commemoration ceremony in New York on Monday, Sept. 11, 2006. This year marks the five year anniversary of the attacks. (AP PHOTO/Justin Lane, pool)
Lewinsky, Bubba, the stained navy dress and his cigars will forever be infamous. They should have been part of the movie.
What they don't say and will never really know is how many recorded or Tivo'ed the show for later viewing.
Yikes! She has not aged gracefully.
"And somebody call Paul Tagliabue and demand a great game for Sunday night!"
Nice to have the GOP running investigations isn't it ?
Who set up the commission. You got it - the corrupt "Two-Party Cartel".
I agree, but who had the power to dismiss her?
I wonder how Roger Goodell would take that ;-)
I didn't focus on the Clinton antics last night, as much as I did on just what a maniacal little bastard Ramzi Yousef really was. I didn't fully appreciate how truly evil he is until last night.
The Clinton clips served more as a good way to set all of this in historical perspective. I'd forgotton that these guys were asking for that reprobate Kuntsler to represent them by name.
This isn't about Clinton. It's about how these Islamo-fascist animals used our own freedoms against us to commit horrendous acts of violence, and why we need to remain vigilant.
-Thank you-
I'm hoping The Texans win at least twice as many games this year as last.
But people aren't appointed to those "independent" commissions to do the right thing, or find the real facts.
Heard one of those people, Kean may be, yesterday or today, whining that all of their recommendations haven't
been implemented.
Pretty arrogant to assume that they have the last word, or that their recommendations are [still] useful,
or may be they are implemented and the NYT hasn't found out about them yet.
I'm just surprised the US wasn't attacked with more force while he was in office.
The US was attacked more while Clinton was in office, he just lied about it. The GREAT CONSPIRACY THEORY BS of the 90's? IT wasn't hard to figure out, it's just that you and millions others don't believe it, not yet that it.
Oklahoma City? WHY would a woman reporter write a book detailing that dozens of witnesses swore that McVeigh and Nichols associated with eight Iraqi's during the time leading up to April 1995 when the Federal Building in OKC was bombed. Why would experts say that the truck bomb did not have enough explosive force to destroy the building? Why?
Why in July, 1996 would HUNDREDS of witnesses say they saw a missile shoot down a passenger jet and kill hundreds of people? Why would they take out a full page ad in 2000 and ask WHY their government agencies lied about what the witnesses say they saw?
IS it because YOU don't believe that old arguement that our goverment just couldn't pull off that level of deception without someone talking?
Once you give it some thought, you'll see that there were more attacks than you believed. WHY WTC bombing #1 in 1993 and no more attacks until the late 1990's?
It all fits together so nicely when you finally agree that things like Sandy Berger stuffing TOP SECRET documents into his underwear, Jamie Gorelick on the 9/11 Commission, and newspaper ads like the attached link:
http://www.twa800.com/eyewitnesses.htm
There is only ONE reasonable conclusion; and that is your government is lying about what happened. IS it a vast conspiracy? The clear answer it is not, it only takes a few powerful insiders to pull off something like this: Richard Clark, Jamie Gorelick, Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton are the main characters here.
These people aren't worried about how history will judge them, they are worried how high they will hang if the American people start thinking clearly again.
Well for us NFL fans that is what VCRs and TIVO was invented for. So much for THAT analysis.
I actually got a better opinion of George Tenet after seeing the film as he eventualy grew some gonads, unlike the rest of the Clintonists with whom he was surrounded. I think the turning point was when a female CIA agent dressed the whole council down for losing Bin Laden the first time. Tenet actually looked ashamed. Albright, Berger, Cohen and the rest weren't even phased.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.