"I'm glad he and I are on the same page. Re-elect the majority which are border enforcement Republicans."
I guess that means we need to vote out the GOP senators that want amnesty?
Right. Since it is actually the Senate, not the house that wants amnesty.
I read you post.
Explain how this...
I guess that means we need to vote out the GOP senators that want amnesty?
Segues to this...
Right. Since it is actually the Senate, not the house that wants amnesty.
I'm sure you have a coherant point in there somewhere, but I can't find it. It sounds like you are stating we should protect even amnesty Republicans because the House as a whole is for enforcement, and focus solely on the Senate. That is, if you aren't simply throwing out two separate disjointed statements.
If the first is what you intended, forget it. I'm not supporting an amnesty Congressman because the Majority of the House has its head on straight. Instead I'll work to get border conservatives challengers elected elsewhere where I can.
If you are making separate points, fine, I'll address them separately.
If your Senator supports amnesty, you are looking at someone that does not care whether they win or lose. Absolutely.
Second point, yes, the House is protecting us from amnesty not the Senate. What's your point?