Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasPatriot8; All

That what I don't understand... It reminds me of when Clinton first came into office and the economy started to boom. He did pass a bill until 7 or 8 months unitl his administration.. Yet he took credit for the booming economy..


71 posted on 09/11/2006 9:13:08 AM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: KevinDavis




Yeah that's such a typical lie. I mean, it takes over a year for Presidential economic policy to kick in and take effect. Which is why the economy didn't start booming until 2003, a couple years after Bush took office and cut taxes, and a year after 9-11, that surely added time to the recovery. the late 90's and 2000 and 2001 was the Clinton Recession, caused by his policies of the 90s which created it, and the early 90s was the Reagan/Bush economic boom, created by their policies and tax cuts which took years to create given the horrible state of the economy they inherrited from Jimmah Cateh. Anyone with a basic understanding of supply and demand economics knows all this to be true. It's just beyond stupid to suggest that Clinton had anything to do with the recession. If he was so great, then the economy wouldn't have started to smell in 1998 and 1999, and his great policies would have still had the economy good in the early part of 2001 before Bush passed a single economic piece of order or sent anything to the Congress. It's just that simple.


144 posted on 09/11/2006 9:35:19 AM PDT by TexasPatriot8 (Liberty must be defended, so the children of those who fell, can understand its value. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson