What would it hurt? One reason the OKC debate has gone on and on is that the feds confiscated tapes from across the street that would've proven their thesis and shut up a lot of people.
As far as Mr. Reynolds I think he's a very intelligent person.......you don't rise up to his level in the gov't by being a stooge.....I just don't pay attention or agree with certain assertions nor more than you'd agree with everything GWB or Cheney tells us.
Apparently you are more of a government-worshipper than you care to admit. There are plenty of stooges who have risen even higher in government. If you want names, we could be here all night.
That aside, what, pray tell, do you you find "intelligent" about Morgan Reynolds' no-plane theory?
I'm curious, you see, because he was just featured in a segment on Brit Hume, and didn't exactly fit my definition of an intelligent person.
Morgan Reynolds and Barrie Zwicker were featured in a segment on Brit Hume's show tonight. It repeats at midnight if you want to see it yourself.
Your boy said the attacks of 9/11 were "a psy-op". He said "It was all a hoax". Jim Angle then stated that Reymolds believes that no airliners hit any buildings that day, which is confirmed by Reynold's own website.
Reynolds went on to explain the difference between LIHOP and MIHOP (though he pronounced them "lee-hop" and "me-hop", which I thought was fairly amusing).
He then stated his belief about the attacks, that "it's about oil, Israel, and logistics for the global domination project." And that it had to be an inside job by the White House, as no one else could get the access necessary to the buildings in order to pull off the hoax.
Do you consider these ravings to be an indication of Morgan Reynolds' "intelligence?"
Do you even consider them to be original? Oil, Israel, world domination?