Posted on 09/11/2006 7:10:10 AM PDT by aculeus
Edited on 09/12/2006 3:52:54 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I deliberately didn't answer that question. A typical 9/11 nutbar's questions contain either an unfounded accusation or an outright lie.
To answer that question in any way would be to agree that there were "tapes held back" (which I don't know any more than they do), and it wouldn't matter what was released anyway. The mere existence of a high-resolution tape would feed into the "foreknowledge" fantasy. I an hear it already---how would they have known to stand in a certain spot and film everything just right, if they hadn't KNOWN AHEAD OF TIME that a missile disguised as a plane was coming in at a preset time?
Morgan Reynolds and Barrie Zwicker were featured in a segment on Brit Hume's show tonight. It repeats at midnight if you want to see it yourself.
Your boy said the attacks of 9/11 were "a psy-op". He said "It was all a hoax". Jim Angle then stated that Reymolds believes that no airliners hit any buildings that day, which is confirmed by Reynold's own website.
Reynolds went on to explain the difference between LIHOP and MIHOP (though he pronounced them "lee-hop" and "me-hop", which I thought was fairly amusing).
He then stated his belief about the attacks, that "it's about oil, Israel, and logistics for the global domination project." And that it had to be an inside job by the White House, as no one else could get the access necessary to the buildings in order to pull off the hoax.
Do you consider these ravings to be an indication of Morgan Reynolds' "intelligence?"
Do you even consider them to be original? Oil, Israel, world domination?
How much did you see?.....a split second of the final impact?
Just have them show all of the confiscated tapes and we can move on.
One thing you seem to keep omitting is the fact he was Chief Economist of the Labor Dept. during the first term of the BUSH ADMINISTRATION......now if he was the loon you paint him to be wouldn't one of those brainiacs figured that out early on? I sure don't remember any public attacks his integrity, intelligence or the work he did for them.......guess he sure snookered them now didn't he?
Bwahahaha! That would be good technology to have.
A. I did not omit it.
B. Big freaking deal if he was. Why is that such a stamp of approval for you?
Forget about his resume. What is your assessment of his competence, based on the CONTENT of the articles on his website?
Many people believe that the towers were destroyed. They just can't be seen anymore because of holograms....It was part of an incredible special effects team from Hollywood used to make a highly suspensful thriller movie /s
Maybe it's good that they have't been rebuilt. It's hard to argue that nothing happened! Just wait 50 years from now, just like the revisionists did with the holocaust!
No.......you're the one dodging the issue here.....as highly placed a person as he was in this gov't. you mean to tell me he could fool everybody into thinking he was competent enough to have a position like that while 'on the side' being a closet loon like you paint him to be? As I said (and how many more times do you have to be told before it sinks in) that there are some things from him and others I do not pay attention to or buy into......any more than you would or others would agree 100% with Bush, Cheney or anybody else on. If you wish to continue believing into the little guy in a cave theory be my guest.
You know what? If you gave it ten seconds of actual thought, you just might stumble onto the likelihood that
NONE OF THIS SH*T CAME UP DURING HIS JOB INTERVIEW WITH THE LABOR DEPARTMENT!
If it had, do you really think he would have gotten the job and title you're so uncommonly enamored of?
And I'm not "painting" Reynolds as a loon. He made a free-will choice to put on a loon suit and start belting out the Call of the Loon. No one held a gun to his head. I owe him no deference simply because he worked in the Bush administration for a while.
As I said (and how many more times do you have to be told before it sinks in) that there are some things from him and others I do not pay attention to or buy into
And yet you won't say what you do pay attention to or do buy into. Even when asked repeatedly. You just drop your snide little insinuations onto threads and try to act innocent.
You're not very convincing.
Neither are you and I'll say it for the last time....if he's as whacked out as you think it would've manifested itself during his time with the Dept. of Labor......and you seem to be incapable of understanding that we all may have fundamental agreements and disagreements with those in the public eye....why is that?
Living lives of luxury on a small island in the Carribean.
How do you know it didn't?
And "As whacked out as *I* think"? I don't know anyone who could read his website and watch his performance on FOX last night and not end up thinking "whack job". Well, maybe you could.
and you seem to be incapable of understanding that we all may have fundamental agreements and disagreements with those in the public eye....why is that?
I have no problem understanding it. You're the one who can't seem to understand why others are not as awed by a bureaucrat's title as you are.
As for those "fundamental agreements and disagreements with those in the public eye", you won't ever come right out and state what yours are. No, you'll just recommend that people watch "Loose Change", praise Morgan Reynolds' intelligence, and scoff at the "little guy billionaire in a cave" theory, and then you'll make like a clam. You're a coward.
The company you keep...
Some people are perfectly "functional" in their jobs while believing totally fringe stuff.
I work with at least 2 such people.
The point about Reynolds is if he is spouting this stuff (which is unbelievable), you have to question his judgment.
And yes, I do question the judgment of my two co-workers.
To be clear, what he is spouting is unbelievable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.