Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I stand corrected. I reread the article and it's now clear that Peters is worse than Howard Dean. Dean at least reached out to NASCAR-types, while Peters is calling us KKK racists. Also, I don't think Dean ever went so far as to accuse conservatives of wanting to murder a billion Muslims.

I can't believe I ever thought nice thoughts about this guy.


16 posted on 09/11/2006 7:08:56 AM PDT by JillValentine (Being a feminist is all about being a victim. Being an armed woman is all about not being a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: JillValentine

well, at least he approves in our taste in bedspreads...


17 posted on 09/11/2006 7:10:19 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (The investigation was a hoax. Fitz should be brought up on charges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: JillValentine

It's more like most of us want to see a billion muslims abandon their superstition and join the modern world.


28 posted on 09/11/2006 8:10:57 AM PDT by 308MBR (Milkin' and a churnin', pickin' cotton, raising "heck" and balin' hay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: JillValentine

"I stand corrected. I reread the article and it's now clear that Peters is worse than Howard Dean. "

Prior to whatever he said recently, he certainly was *NOT* worse than Howard Dean, he is not a Liberal, was an excellent reporter on Iraq and GWOT, and wasn't as far as I could tell un hinged in any way.

Having just read it, I think Peters is way off base, but certainly not a Howard Dean. If there are 'nuke Mecca' people who think we need to fight 1 billion muslims and think of muslims as Peters says they do, they need to scolded as idiots. (When it happens here on FR too). We have to distinguish between the great danger of radicalized Islam and the non-danger that most Muslims pose.

But Peters' column is making a strawman argument that critics of Islam are attacking Muslims as a whole. And his defense of Islam and Muslims is curious. He mentions Indonesia, but seems unaware of sectarian violence there (or he would point it out as an exception). one example: Muslim thugs beheaded some Indonesian girls for the crime of being Christian last year. Such a crime would be unbelievable if I had not had the misfortune of actually seeing the pictures of it. Horrible.

If we want to be honorable conservatives,
it would be wrong to engage in name-calling (and it was wrong for Peters to do so) and better to talk Peters off the ledge, explaining why orthodox Islam and redical clerics are a serious danger to an extent that Peters might not understand.

Peters column:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/09072006/postopinion/opedcolumnists/islam_haters__an_enemy_within_opedcolumnists_ralph_peters.htm

e-mail to Taranto about his endorsement of Peters
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006372.html

Jihadwatch response:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/013032.php


40 posted on 09/11/2006 10:13:16 AM PDT by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson