1 posted on
09/11/2006 6:42:05 AM PDT by
Perdogg
To: Perdogg
I don't think the stories compare.
The Democrat party threatened ABC to edit or pull a factual drama- where I believe each scene is documented.
But the Reagan special was a fictional hatchet job written to order and stopped only by people who loved Reagan.
2 posted on
09/11/2006 6:49:06 AM PDT by
Vision
("As a man thinks...so is he." Proverbs 23:7)
To: Perdogg
There's a big difference between consumer pressure and threats from a political party.
4 posted on
09/11/2006 6:52:01 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: Perdogg
The two don't compare.
TheReagans was written by two homsexuals who admitted they were making up scenes in order to change the perception of reagan.
Additionally, this was private individuals doing a private protest. There were not senators jumping in to threaten special hearings or subpoena power.
10 posted on
09/11/2006 7:10:19 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Perdogg
If the two situations are similar, could you please tell me which five Republican Senators sent a threatening letter to CBS insinuating the termination of their broadcast license.
11 posted on
09/11/2006 7:12:01 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(The investigation was a hoax. Fitz should be brought up on charges.)
To: Perdogg
"Ironically, CBS' decision came two days after the network's 75th anniversary special, which included a skit by the Smothers Brothers poking fun at CBS for firing them more than 30 years ago because of their political content. "Another precedent came in 1979, when CBS pulled a comedy series about a black congressman after complaints by some actual black politicians who had seen a screening, said TV historian Tim Brooks"
15 posted on
09/11/2006 7:30:06 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson