I posted this on another thread... but very appropriate here.
9:03
Words used to describe the second attack by the Today crew.
Something Deliberate (Matt)
What are the odds of two seperate planes (Al Roker)
Why is this happening and what in the world is going on? (Katie)
Incident (Katie)
Incident (Katie Again)
Explosion (Caller)
The 2nd Plane Fly In (Katie... kind of like an SUV that drives itself)
9:09
"The question of Terrorist Activity has to surface" (Katie, really)
These idiots took 6 minutes to even conjecture that it could be terrorism on the air.
9:13
Matt still on the small commuter plane story for the first 'impact.'
Deliberate.
After speculating about 'small commuter planes' Katie explains that there are 'unconfirmed reports' about hijackings.
Shocking
Completely unclear
9:16
2nd reference to terrorism. Relating to 1993 bombing.
9:19
Speculation about some kind of 'terrorist' event.
9:20
Reports that the Pentagon is calling it a terrorist attack.
9:20
Katie questioning the concept of 'terror attack.'
Everytime Katie say 'terrorist' it is thick with reluctance.
9:29
Katie has to prompted to 'hijacked'
Quickly followed by
"Unconfirmed, speculation."
Katie is an idiot.
9:33
Andrea Mitchell mentions Osama Bin Ladin
This perfectly shows the incompetence and first-reaction response from the MSM. In their PC world, they cannot comprehend the meaning of the words terrorists/war/unprovoked/intentional. They hide behind their PC excuses and lame lamentations later, but the *in-the-moment-live-reporting* says it all.