Skip to comments.
Is ABC straying from the Democrat plantation?
Posted on 09/11/2006 12:33:09 AM PDT by bouchard3333
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: Mogollon
spueing=spewing (forgot to engage brain)
41
posted on
09/11/2006 12:57:35 PM PDT
by
Mogollon
To: bouchard3333
Let's wait and see till we see how bad Bush gets bashed in tonight's episode of TPT911.
42
posted on
09/11/2006 12:59:06 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: bouchard3333
When ABC presents a documentary film that fully details the incompetence and cowardice of Clinton and his administration in the face of numerous attacks on our country, we may be able to say that ABC is, at last, taking a stand for the truth. But until that happens, don't get your hopes up. The upcoming congressional campaigns and, later, the presidential primaries, will tell the tale. And, based on past experience, that tale will not be pretty.
To: bouchard3333
I think that the DNC is trying like mad to get rid of Hillary and Bill Clinton, and that they are using this.
But remember this. All the claims of the DU nutjobs on government censorship are real, only the censorship is coming from their fellow travelers.
44
posted on
09/11/2006 5:47:59 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: bouchard3333
ABC isn't going anywhere. They're still so far to the left I can't even see them. Every word their news readers recite on the nightly news comes straight from the new york times.
To: bouchard3333
When they get rid of "Desperate Housewives" then I'll believe it.
46
posted on
09/11/2006 11:03:38 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: bouchard3333
Dare I suggest that some things might be changing with the passing of Peter Jennings?
-PJ
To: JillValentine
I thought Iger was a republican, my bad i stand corrected ::sigh:: just another liberal in charge of a major network television station
48
posted on
09/12/2006 1:26:53 PM PDT
by
bouchard3333
(http://www.bouchardforussenate.com/)
To: beyond the sea
"A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victim, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared. The traitor is the plague." - Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman Orator --- 106-43 B.C.
here here!
49
posted on
09/12/2006 1:30:17 PM PDT
by
bouchard3333
(http://www.bouchardforussenate.com/)
To: Vision
"they need to make a docu-drama about the docu-drama; about what Clinton was doing to shut this thing down"
It'll be called "The Day The Constitution Stood Still"
50
posted on
09/12/2006 1:33:25 PM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
To: bouchard3333
His political contributions belie that theory. $2500 to the RNC, $10,000 to the DNC and even a donation to Waxman.
To: wtc911
Why would they, really, want her as POTUS? She has already stated publicly that she wants to take their money "for the greater good." We know they went after Gates whole company when Bill was POTUS and they were just warming up when Bush won.
What I don't understand is why Bill Gates still supports them after the Clinton Justice Department went after Microsoft the way they did. Certainly a wealthy person can be philanthropic without having to be a flaming liberal and why would you support people who are anti-big business like the dems?
Of, course in Igers case at ABC the nets are probably hoping for fewer SEC restrictions with the dems.
To: bouchard3333
Lots of our government officials and most of the old media should become familiar with that quote.
53
posted on
09/12/2006 1:51:37 PM PDT
by
beyond the sea
( A tree fell in woods, a conservative wasn't around, would it still kill the liberal chained to it?)
To: bouchard3333
Maybe he's a businessman. Fox, has just about the worst news coverage available - its not even 24 hour news - and it wipes the floor with its opponents. All by themselves they claim a market of disenfranchised conservatives.
People can't afford to live on the coasts like they have been and have been moving inland to red states. It's where the jobs are going if they stay in the US.
Why not at least seek not to offend conservatives?
To: Arizona Carolyn
We agree. The MSM are shying away from her highness and sending the message loud & clear.
55
posted on
09/12/2006 2:11:33 PM PDT
by
wtc911
(You can't get there from here)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson