Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
It was not my argument that Reno WAS responsible.

It was my argument that Reno gave Clinton the cover that he WAS NOT responsible.

After all, the Clinton's never accept the consequences of their actions, either of them.

It amazes me that anyone could misinterpret the statement, "He avoided his responsibility on this one too. Attorney General Janet Reno claimed she gave the order and was responsible", as I somehow was absolving Clinton of his complete responsibility is way, way beyond my comprehension.
235 posted on 09/11/2006 7:17:25 AM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: Beckwith
"It amazes me that anyone could misinterpret the statement, "He avoided his responsibility on this one too. Attorney General Janet Reno claimed she gave the order and was responsible", as I somehow was absolving Clinton of his complete responsibility is way, way beyond my comprehension."

I'm sorry you got this impression from my response to your post. I was simply pointing out why Reno's "acceptance for responsibility" for Waco was a blatant lie.

In no way did I mean to imply that you were absolving clinton.

238 posted on 09/11/2006 9:06:08 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson