To: kattracks
It was not my argument that Reno WAS responsible.
It was my argument that Reno gave Clinton the cover that he WAS NOT responsible.
After all, the Clinton's never accept the consequences of their actions, either of them.
It amazes me that anyone could misinterpret the statement, "He avoided his responsibility on this one too. Attorney General Janet Reno claimed she gave the order and was responsible", as I somehow was absolving Clinton of his complete responsibility is way, way beyond my comprehension.
235 posted on
09/11/2006 7:17:25 AM PDT by
Beckwith
(The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: Beckwith
"It amazes me that anyone could misinterpret the statement, "He avoided his responsibility on this one too. Attorney General Janet Reno claimed she gave the order and was responsible", as I somehow was absolving Clinton of his complete responsibility is way, way beyond my comprehension."
I'm sorry you got this impression from my response to your post. I was simply pointing out why Reno's "acceptance for responsibility" for Waco was a blatant lie.
In no way did I mean to imply that you were absolving clinton.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson