Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative blonde
-"That is pretty narrow pro-life thinking. How about the 47 million unborn children who have already been aborted in the USA since 1973. Giulliani doesn't care one cojones about them. I would never vote for a pro-abort because if they don't get the life issue right, all their thinking is wrongly skewed."

I believe that taking a life, even in the case of incest or rape, is MURDER! So, don't lecture me about 'narrow thinking'. But, if I'm given a choice about who's the best person (above and beyond anyone else) to look out for all of us, it's a simple choice. Beside, Giuilinani can't possibly under-perform Reagan, who's own Supreme Court apppointments (O'Connor and Kennedy) voted against Pro Life!

See, even Reagan couldn't guarantee a Pro-Life vote.

Seems to me that it's your thinking that's reflective of 'narrow' ('who cares about any other issue') thinking.

329 posted on 09/10/2006 8:59:55 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]


To: LibFreeUSA

My thinking is that I don't need a Giulliani to "look out for all of us" or me. I look to God to do that. God seems to be the last One any one thinks about any more in our increasingly secular nation. Your view of politics adds to the secularist gaining ground. We all will have to stand before God some day and justify our choices here on earth. I can not in good conscience justify killing unborn babies by voting for politicians who would permit this never ending atrocity to continue.


598 posted on 09/11/2006 8:36:33 AM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson