Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
I was also disappointed at the feeble level of thinking that went into this man's blather. He had a shot at a national audience with his foolishness, and what he said was embarrassingly childish. The moderator, I forget who, treated him kindly, and didn't laugh at him, though he should have. The man made a fool of himself, claiming that no aircraft hit the WTC towers, that we we saw on television was "cartoon animation". The moderator remarked that millions of people saw the second plane hit the south tower live on television, that kind of rattled the "professor" but he stuck to his story, as stupid as it was. There is really no point in doing a thorough debunking of all this nonsense at this point, that should be reserved for plausible conspiracy theories. This crap is just asinine, ludicrous, and absurd on its face, if you know the facts. Don't bother debunking it, just dismiss it out of hand, its already been exhaustively debunked... see the famous Popular Mechanics article. Someone will have the link...
175 posted on 09/10/2006 3:18:04 PM PDT by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Richard Axtell; FairOpinion
Link
176 posted on 09/10/2006 3:20:31 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson