To: pollyannaish
No doubt... Bush didn't do jack to stop Terrorism before 9/11. Not interested in 'nation building' and all that.
The problem for dems is Bush didn't do jack for a few months, Clinton didn't do jack for years.
The BIGGEST difference, BY FAR, is how the parties have decided to respond to it after 9/11 where the CLEAR goobers are they.
1,795 posted on
09/10/2006 7:02:54 PM PDT by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: FreedomNeocon
1,816 posted on
09/10/2006 7:04:14 PM PDT by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: FreedomNeocon
Bush didn't do jack to stop Terrorism before 9/11. That's not really quite true. There was lots of testimony with back up calendars, etc., that Bush ordered Condi and others in the intel world to prepare reports on how to take down the Taliban and AQ. It hit his desk 2-3 days before 9/11. It's in the 9/11 Commission Report.
1,838 posted on
09/10/2006 7:05:36 PM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: FreedomNeocon
Exactly. I think there is plenty of pre-911 blame to go around. Lots of it. At the same time, I don't think anyone could have really anticipated it...at least it being so successful.
So standing around pointing fingers is idiotic. It's how we responded that matters...and those distinctions are VERY clear. They want the same old, same old. We want to win.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
