No way in hell I watch this. ABC bent over and took it for Clinton. Sandy Burglar was on CNN whining the other day. How does that fat bastard have any credibility?
Editorial: Sandy Berger's crime
http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20050404-084700-5791r.htm
What was Mr. Berger doing with the documents? And why did he destroy only three? The likeliest answer is that he sought to conceal comments he or other Clinton administration officials wrote on them when they were circulating in January 2000. He couldn't have been trying to erase the document itself from the record, since copies besides the five exist elsewhere. What's likelier is that jottings in the margins of the three copies he destroyed bore telling indications of the Clinton administration's approach to terrorism.