[soloNYer]

I believe part 2 of the "Path to 9/11" is heavily critical of the Bush administration. However, since Hollywood is 100 to 1 against Bush, the administration shrugs it off as another attack. Clinton and the Dems aren't used to being criticized.

This shows me that a little criticism for the left is extremely damaging, whereas the multitude of Hollywood criticism of the right has only a little effect. The left can't take a little spotlight.

[MNJohnnie]

The other thing, when you actually accomplish a lot of things (Bush) someone squealing about it does not bother you. When all you have is hype, hysteria and demography (Clinton) someone pointing out the smoke and mirrors reality threaten your whole reputation.

President Bush's record stands objective criticism, President Clinton's does not./p>

[rodguy911]

Brilliant post here.

Rush explained it as Clinton trying to protect his ever so tenuous legacy.

His take is that Bubba's legacy is so weak, in fact, that the true facts, should they get out, monica,aspirin factory bombing, chinese secrets etc. and now letting ben Laden go when he was surrounded,could tumble any chance Hilliary has.

It could also ruin his quest to reroute the truth once again.