Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csense

Why were some creationists ragging me because I said that many of you believe that "made in His image" meant the body, not the soul?

They claimed not only did I know little about Christianity, I knew little about creationism.

I was raised in the church, yet I never heard of the belief that "God's image" was physical until I came to these threads. I don't know anyone in RL that does. Everyone I know accepts that "in His image" means our ETERNAL soul.

To attribute our decaying, changing bodies as "God's image" instead of the only thing we have that is eternal? Blasphemous, to say the least.


139 posted on 09/10/2006 1:26:35 AM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason
Why were some creationists ragging me because I said that many of you believe that "made in His image" meant the body, not the soul?

They claimed not only did I know little about Christianity, I knew little about creationism.

I could hazard a guess, but I prefer to let others speak for themselves. You'll have to ask those that made this argument initially.

172 posted on 09/10/2006 11:32:45 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson