[okie01]

suggested that America and Iraq would be safer if Saddam Hussein was still in power.

Did he note that, if Saddam were still in power, we would still be enforcing no-fly zones and sanctions? And having to protect Bush 41 from potential Iraqi assassins?

And, tell me, did Senator Rockefeller vote for the Iraq Liberation Act which called for "regime change"...in 1998?!

What an utter partisan moron.

[Armedanddangerous]

I believe it did in fact vote for it.

[Mo1]

Did he note that, if Saddam were still in power, we would still be enforcing no-fly zones and sanctions? And having to protect Bush 41 from potential Iraqi assassins?

If Saddam were still in power .. The UN and their buddies would still be raking in the $$$ bribes from the Oil for Food Scandal

[headstamp]

And how about when the sanctions were finally weakened and undermined courtesy of Russia, China, et al? All these countries that had "day after" contracts to begin oil field development once the sanctions were lifted. This would have resulted in an extreme amount of oil wealth put into use to restart/enhance Iraq's Nuclear and other WMD programs.

Then when he finally croaked either naturally or unnaturally, one of his psychopathic sons would be in charge with his finger on the button.

People just don't look at the whole picture in this situation as it was developing including idiot Senators like Rockingchairfeller.