Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Clinton's Saturday Radio Address to the Nation [RE: Saddam WMD program]
Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 05114187 | December 19, 1998 | nwrep

Posted on 09/09/2006 11:00:05 AM PDT by nwrep

Good morning. As I speak to you, America's men and women in uniform and our British allies are fighting for security, peace, and freedom in the Persian Gulf. They're doing an outstanding job, showing bravery and Skill, making our country proud. Our thoughts and prayers are with them. Putting our troops in harm's way is the hardest decision any President faces. I believe our action in Iraq clearly is in America's interest. Never again can we allow Saddam Hussein to develop nuclear weapons, poison gas, biological weapons, or missiles to deliver them. He has used such terrible weapons before against soldiers, against his neighbors, against civilians. And if left unchecked, he'll use them again.

For 7 1/2 years, United Nations weapons inspectors did a truly remarkable job in forcing Saddam to disclose and destroy weapons he insisted he did not have. But over the past year, Saddam repeatedly has blocked their efforts. Each time with intensive diplomacy backed by the threat of force, we compelled him to back down.

Last month, when he agreed to fully cooperate, I canceled an American military action. But I, along with Prime Minister Tony Blair of Great Britain, made it absolutely clear that if he did not fully cooperate, we would have no choice but to act without further negotiation or warning.

For three weeks, the U.N. inspectors tested Saddam's commitment. He failed the test, hindering and preventing inspections, withholding and destroying documents. As their chairman concluded, the inspectors can no longer do their vital job. Under these circumstances, had we failed to respond, it would have given Saddam a green light to rebuild his arsenal and threaten his neighbors. I acted quickly because, as my military advisors stressed, the longer we waited, the more time Saddam would have to disperse his forces and protect his arsenal. Our mission is clear: to degrade Saddam's capacity to develop and deliver weapons of mass destruction and threaten the region. Based on reports from the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and the CIA Director, I believe the mission is going well.

Now, where do we go from here? Our long-term strategy is clear: First, we stand ready to use force again if Saddam takes threatening action such as seeking to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction, menacing his neighbors or his own Kurdish citizens, or challenging allied aircraft.

Second, so long as Iraq fails to live up to its obligations, we'll work with the international community to keep the sanctions in place. They have cost Saddam more than $120 billion, resources he would have devoted to rebuilding his weaponry. At the same time, we will continue to support the ongoing program to provide humanitarian supplies to the people of Iraq, so that Saddam uses his oil to buy food and medicine, not tanks and missiles.

Finally, we'll strengthen our engagement with Iraqis who want a new government, one that will respect its citizens and live in peace with its neighbors. We must not harbor illusions, however, that change will come easily or quickly. But we should go forward, and we will, with determination, working with opposition groups, strengthening the global consensus for bringing Iraq a government worthy of its people.

As our forces carry out their missions, I want to express my heartfelt thanks to all our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines in the Gulf and all around the world, who work every day to defend our freedom, promote stability and democracy, and bring hope. To those forces now engaged in the battle against Saddam Hussein, you have our appreciation for your courage, and our Nation's hopes for your safe and successful return.

To all those in our Armed Forces who will spend this holiday season away from home, away from your loved ones, we thank you for your service. You are helping to ensure a just and peaceful world.

As we enter the season of peace, we remain ever hopeful that one day all nations and all communities will actually live in peace, with tolerance, respect, and civility. There can be no greater gift for our children.

Thanks for listening.

NOTE: The President spoke at 10:06 a.m. from the Oval Office at the White House. In his remarks, he referred to President Saddam Hussein of Iraq; and Richard Butler, Executive Chairman, United Nations Special Commission.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

By William J. Clinton


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2006 11:00:08 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Should be nailed to the top of the the thread


2 posted on 09/09/2006 11:01:34 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? Samurai? Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Yeah, yeah. Doesnt matter to the MSM or your standard moonbat. That was then. That was their boy. It was all ok. all of it. This is now.

But it is still fun to rub their noses in it good and expose the grand hipocrisy that is modern liberalism.


3 posted on 09/09/2006 11:04:02 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin; onyx; rubeng; Peach

PING


4 posted on 09/09/2006 11:04:31 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Nothing like "standing by your word," huh?


5 posted on 09/09/2006 11:11:15 AM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
so that Saddam uses his oil to buy food and medicine, not tanks and missiles.

Food and medicine......
6 posted on 09/09/2006 11:19:44 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Clinton does not seek a legacy based upon what he actually did, just ask Monica.


7 posted on 09/09/2006 11:21:19 AM PDT by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Should be nailed to the top of his head.


8 posted on 09/09/2006 11:30:52 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Should be nailed to the top of his head.

I got some 16 inch spikes out in the garage, can we use them?

10 posted on 09/09/2006 12:38:52 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? Samurai? Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; nwrep
I don't think it matters a hill of beans that every other country and every other politician said that Saddam had WMDs, so it's not our fault if he didn't have them. I don't think it matters, either, that they all said he was working hand-in-glove with a host of terrorist organizations, so it's not our fault if those ties aren't there.

Why doesn't it matter? Because in the end you're saying that Saddam did not have WMDs and you're saying that he did not have terrorist ties.

What matters to the public is demonstating that he MOST LIKELY did have WMDs and that he MOST LIKELY did have terrorist ties.

That is the debate, political, and moral high ground. If this Republican Party does not put forward a meaningful defense of its policies, then they can be shot at from every side.

Now the truth is that Saddam DID HAVE WMDs. He did have extensive terrorist ties. There is proof of this that would fill books.

11 posted on 09/09/2006 12:42:18 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Sooooooooooooooooo it's all Clinton's Fault?? ;0)


12 posted on 09/09/2006 1:27:46 PM PDT by Mo1 (Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

December 19,1998...wasn't that also the day he was impeached?


13 posted on 09/09/2006 1:29:09 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Higher visibility leads to greater zottability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; Dog; ...

Ping A Ling


14 posted on 09/09/2006 1:30:40 PM PDT by Mo1 (Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Bump again!!


15 posted on 09/09/2006 1:34:15 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep


Oh my.
GOOD post!


16 posted on 09/09/2006 1:36:07 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

BTT and a bookmark. I'm going to slip this little gem into the next "Bush lied" debate I encounter.


17 posted on 09/09/2006 1:41:54 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

I was just thinking the same thing.

Perhaps the day the Senate started deliberations?


18 posted on 09/09/2006 1:46:39 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

BTTT


19 posted on 09/09/2006 1:49:46 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

bttt


20 posted on 09/09/2006 1:53:20 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson