The Clinton crew doesn't do that well in law cases.
Remember when they went after Drudge (using Sidney Blumenthal)
and how they settled the case and left with their tail between their legs once Drudge's lawyers got to work at the depositions?
It's clear this is a veiled threat, meant to be received as a 'friendly' warning to ABC.
This is the legal equivalent of the troops massing on the border.
The clintons are marching their lawyer soldiers as intimidation.
This is not just for ABC this is a shot across the bow of anyone who intends to cit to it.
The clintons are reminding the WIMPS of the sunday morning talk shows to SHUT UP about this.
Any show that does not discuss this on sunday has officially jumped the shark.
There are lots of outstanding cases against the Clinton's that have been going on for years. Check out the Judicial Watch website.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/litigation.shtml
[ALEXANDER et al. v. FBI, et. al. - Judicial Watch is representing the plaintiffs in a class-action suit filed by White House employees of the Bush and Reagan administrations whose FBI files were wrongly accessed by the Clinton White House. The White House and FBI are being sued under the federal Privacy Act, while the individual defendants B Bernard Nussbaum, Craig Livingstone, Anthony Marceca and Hillary Clinton are being sued for common-law tort of invasion of privacy.]