Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion

The death rate is 100%. Given a choice between heart attack and cancer, I'll take the heart attack.


6 posted on 09/09/2006 7:21:24 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh

Having had both in my family, I agree with that...as tho we have choice...


15 posted on 09/09/2006 7:29:26 AM PDT by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
The death rate is 100%.

Not yet! We are still here. Ooops! There went you. Oh well, I'm still here.

20 posted on 09/09/2006 7:44:51 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

>>I'll take the heart attack.

My plan is to die of a heart attack after being hugged and congratulated by my children and grandchildren for crossing the finish line and having set a new PR in the Hawaiian Iron Man , in the year 2045, at the age of 85.


73 posted on 09/09/2006 2:16:54 PM PDT by VxH (There are those who declare the impossible - and those who do the impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
Given a choice between heart attack and cancer, I'll take the heart attack.

I'll amen that statement. I have researched my family's history on both sides and I can't find one case of cancer. They all die of heart attacks or strokes.

I have already had one heart attack and find it comforting to know that I likely will go that way. A lingering and painful death by cancer I would rather forego.

78 posted on 09/09/2006 8:23:09 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson