Skip to comments.
'PATH' MISSED REAL 9/11 STORY ( What was accurate in the ABC Docu-drama and what wasn't)
New York Post ^
| 09/08/2006
| john Podhoretz
Posted on 09/09/2006 6:36:48 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: SirLinksalot
I have a feeling that ABC is loving all of this controversy. It is generating free "buzz" for the mini-series. Think about all of the people that know about this that didn't before.
I don't think for a moment they will pull this.
To: SirLinksalot
The real Albright says she neither did nor said such a thing and that the meeting we see in the movie never took place. And the real Bill Clinton said the he never has sexual relations with that woman. Miss Lewinsky.
Such an honest bunch, they are...
4
posted on
09/09/2006 6:39:18 AM PDT
by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: SirLinksalot
The simple fact of the matter is that, with a million other things going on all at once - all of which seemed more pressing at the time, the threat went uncomprehended. The 9/11 Commission rightly called this a "failure of imagination." Cripes, Pod, how much more clearly did al Qaeda have to paint the picture for Bill Clinton to take them seriously? But nooo, he instead directed his command at the Serb/Albanian conflict in Kosovo.
5
posted on
09/09/2006 6:40:04 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(This tagline has been photoshopped)
To: SirLinksalot
me thinks thow doest protest too much
6
posted on
09/09/2006 6:40:14 AM PDT
by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: SoftballMominVA
I don't think for a moment they will pull this.They won't pull it, but will they emasculate it to suit the Democratic version of historical truth?
To: SirLinksalot
..............The simple fact of the matter is that, with a million other things going on all at once - all of which seemed more pressing at the time, the threat went uncomprehended......................
Yeah! The Unitarians that rammed into the Cole were just playing. Boys will be boys!
8
posted on
09/09/2006 6:44:30 AM PDT
by
aShepard
(Maybe the UN should donate UNICEF proceeds to the Gates Foundation, and fold!)
To: SoftballMominVA
I give ABC kudos for this, presuming the film airs as planned. Lefties own Hollywood. For anything other than leftie swill to get made there is a monumental step forward IMO.
9
posted on
09/09/2006 6:45:45 AM PDT
by
veronica
(NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
To: SirLinksalot
Very well done analysis by John Podhoretz.
Of course, many more questions come to my mind.
10
posted on
09/09/2006 6:46:00 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: BelegStrongbow; ohioWfan
11
posted on
09/09/2006 6:48:35 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: SirLinksalot
The real Albright says she neither did nor said such a thing and that the meeting we see in the movie never took place.However, if she could have, she would have.
To: SirLinksalot
The simple fact of the matter is that, with a million other things going on all at once - all of which seemed more pressing at the time, the threat went uncomprehended. The attack was so diabolical that I cannot fault anyone but the Islamofascists, when all is said and done. Who could imagine such an attack? If there is one moment that could have changed things, I guess it was when access to the computer of one of the 9-11 related Islamofascists was denied (I forget the exact details) - or when all those ratbags taking flying lessons had been noticed.
Another VERY telling moment was the Clinton admin. reaction to the bombing of the Cole, which is a symbol of all of the PC crap that led to 9-11.
13
posted on
09/09/2006 6:51:22 AM PDT
by
veronica
(NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
To: Sooth2222
What I'm hearing from liberals is the usual. They blindly believe Halfbright, Burgler and other administration officials but call others liars.
14
posted on
09/09/2006 6:52:51 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: SirLinksalot
If the first WTC bombing in 1993 had been successful and the two towers had toppled into each other and then into the street, there could easily have been more deaths in a few minutes than we suffered during the whole Vietnam War. That was the intention of the bombers and it was not merely a crime - it was an overt act of war. Talk about not connecting the dots ...
15
posted on
09/09/2006 6:53:18 AM PDT
by
Menehune56
(Oderint Dum Metuant (Let them hate, so long as they fear - Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC)))
To: veronica
Just read this morning that ABC is "tweaking" the version of events to appease Clinton administration officials - you know in much the same way that the press changes their articles so as not to spread inaccuracies and mis-representation of President Bush and the Republicans.
16
posted on
09/09/2006 6:57:30 AM PDT
by
onevoter
To: SirLinksalot
The thing that's really sad is that many people who watch it will think it's absolutely 100% true in every detail. Clinton and his cronies would not be so freaked out if they didn't have plenty to hide, and ABC will make whatever changes it takes to please the left.
17
posted on
09/09/2006 7:00:08 AM PDT
by
Just Lori
(VOTE!...........or suffer the consequences.......)
To: onevoter
Believe me the tweaking can't add up to much at this late date. No time for reshoots or anything that extensive.
And by making such a stink, the Dems look like they have something to hide re: 9-11. I suspect there are copies of the original floating out there too. There always are with TV movies because lots of people see the various versions as the film is edited. Everyone from the director's assistant to members of the crew.
18
posted on
09/09/2006 7:04:37 AM PDT
by
veronica
(NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
To: SirLinksalot
Pull the miniseries and produce a real documentary who's accuracy is at least defensible. Now if someone produces a historically-accurate version people will tune it out.
To: SirLinksalot
Is this a matter of "who was" was?
On pages 182 and 183 of Losing Bin Laden by Richard Miniter, it says Clinton's plan had Joint Chiefs of Staff Vice-Chairman Joe Ralston in Pakistan to notify the Pakis when the cruise missiles approached Paki airspace.
Mad Maddie may have not told the Pakis directly, but she was most likely involved in the "plan".
20
posted on
09/09/2006 7:06:33 AM PDT
by
Bob from De
((All liberals may not be narcissists...but it sure seems to help))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson