Heh.
1 posted on
09/08/2006 12:52:19 PM PDT by
andyk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: andyk
2 posted on
09/08/2006 12:54:12 PM PDT by
3AngelaD
To: andyk
How much did this study cost?
3 posted on
09/08/2006 12:54:56 PM PDT by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: andyk
Really? Surprise surprise. I thought it was just coincidence that, for thousands of years, men have fought in wars -- not women.
4 posted on
09/08/2006 12:55:09 PM PDT by
dinoparty
To: andyk
STUDY: BIRDS BETTER SUITED TO FLYING
5 posted on
09/08/2006 12:55:35 PM PDT by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: andyk
In other breaking news, it appears women are better suited to raising children.....
IDIOTS
6 posted on
09/08/2006 12:56:09 PM PDT by
MadeInAmerica
(- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Breaking and Entering means Unannounced Visit)
To: andyk
And yard work, don't forget the yard work!!
7 posted on
09/08/2006 12:56:22 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: andyk
Why do we have to keep reinventing the wheel?
Weenie PC types will be the ruination of this world as we know it ... it's only a matter of time.
8 posted on
09/08/2006 12:57:04 PM PDT by
BluH2o
To: andyk
At least our government didn't waste billions on this "no $h!t" study.
10 posted on
09/08/2006 12:57:22 PM PDT by
stevio
(Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
To: andyk
Where is the Obviousman graphic?
12 posted on
09/08/2006 12:58:21 PM PDT by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: andyk
"A nurse returning from work discovered an intruder armed with a hammer in her home and strangled him with HER bare hands, police said".
I dispute the study conclusions based on this story......
13 posted on
09/08/2006 12:58:24 PM PDT by
bordergal
(John)
To: andyk
Not to discredit any women or gays in the military, but IMO, they should not be on the battlefield.
Oh, and I believe Clinton is who we are to thank for that. Gutted the military spending and changed the roles/rules of who is allowed in, etc. What a dolt.
14 posted on
09/08/2006 12:58:37 PM PDT by
Lucky9teen
( If you can't, you must. If you must, you can.)
To: andyk
And the study only cost $21 million in tax money...
To: andyk
In other news, cats kill mice, dogs chase cars, and only women can still carry an embryo to full term.
16 posted on
09/08/2006 12:58:47 PM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: andyk
This was also recently covered in the publication "Duh."
18 posted on
09/08/2006 12:59:03 PM PDT by
Skooz
(Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
To: andyk
Exhibit number One: Army Reserve Brigadier-General Janis Karpinski.
19 posted on
09/08/2006 12:59:07 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: andyk
21 posted on
09/08/2006 12:59:16 PM PDT by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: andyk
Money had to be spent for this?
Could have used it to train more female military nurses.
To: andyk
It's not necessarily positive news. If men weren't so good at war, we wouldn't have so many wars.
But human nature is what it is.
28 posted on
09/08/2006 1:01:26 PM PDT by
CobaltBlue
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: andyk
Men Better Suited for War, Research Finds
...unless they're French.
29 posted on
09/08/2006 1:01:29 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: andyk
Aww jeez, not this shit again!
30 posted on
09/08/2006 1:02:17 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
