It is actually two different things.
With Reagan, the lefties were portraying not policy but a condemnation of the man in the form of a hit piece.
With Pathway to 9/11, the lefties(they are Democrat donors but you won't see that anywhere) are portraying events and policies, not the people. This isn't a hit piece. This is facts about an event filled in with the usual dramatizations of the events leading up to 9/11.
Funny thing though. The Clintonistas are not bitching about the content. They are bitching about little things like slamming the phone down. There is a reason for that.
By removing Berger slamming down the phone, you have to change the content of the phone call. That's what the libs are trying to do. Destroy this production based on piddly things so that the content gets altered along with it.
By any chance, did you read Ann Coulter's book, Godless? Notice how no one in the RAT party criticized the fact that Coulter called them godless? They criticized her reference to four attention seeking sows with a political agenda.
By condemning Coulter, they tried to remove the content from being scrutinized.
OK. Thats actually a pretty reasoned argument (as opposed to the foaming at the mouth comments elsewhere). I will withdraw my comment pending a closer look at the issue.