"He resurrected with a body of flesh and bones, but not blood.
Where did you get the idea that Jesus has a body without blood?"
"Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have." - Luke 24:39
Bone produced blood. Flesh requires blood or it will rot. Why you would even argue that Jesus had no blood is laughable. What is the point of that? Jesus has a new body but didn't bother to fill it with blood? Why? That would not fulfill the promise of arising from the dead. Just because Jesus shed his blood at Calvary doesn't mean that he was bloodless in his arisen body.
It's like they think Jesus is finite.
SD