Skip to comments.
Student Newspaper Lampoons Mother of God
TFP Student Action ^
| 09-08-06
| TFP
Posted on 09/08/2006 9:53:25 AM PDT by concernedAmerican1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-153 next last
To: RoadTest
Now you're splitting angels on the head of a pin. I'm sorry you use words like "dead forever" without considering their meanings.
SD
To: RoadTest
"Also, please provide any evidence you have of ANY person other than our Lord who is called a son or daughter of Mary. (And don't even start with "brother of" because that was a term used very loosely in Biblical times.)" You don't believe the book I base my faith on.
No, I don't know what book you are even talking about because no translation of the Bible that I've ever seen mentions Mary having any children other than Jesus.
122
posted on
09/08/2006 1:12:07 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: hosepipe
I don't think even many Protestants would agree with that one.
To: RoadTest
"He resurrected with a body of flesh and bones, but not blood.
Where did you get the idea that Jesus has a body without blood?"
"Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have." - Luke 24:39
Bone produced blood. Flesh requires blood or it will rot. Why you would even argue that Jesus had no blood is laughable. What is the point of that? Jesus has a new body but didn't bother to fill it with blood? Why? That would not fulfill the promise of arising from the dead. Just because Jesus shed his blood at Calvary doesn't mean that he was bloodless in his arisen body.
To: RoadTest; SoothingDave
Most sane people know that Anglicans and Lutherans do not venerate Mary. While this may be true of SOME Anglicans, traditional Lutherans believe exactly the same things about Mary that Martin Luther did.
125
posted on
09/08/2006 1:15:02 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Kirkwood
Just because Jesus shed his blood at Calvary doesn't mean that he was bloodless in his arisen body. It's like they think Jesus is finite.
SD
To: SoothingDave
It's like they think Jesus is finite. And the Bible is quite clear in describing God as infinite.
127
posted on
09/08/2006 1:19:13 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: RoadTest; SoothingDave
How do you square that with the teaching from the Torah Funny, I had always believed that Christ made a new covenant.
128
posted on
09/08/2006 1:20:56 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: RoadTest
Heavenly bodied beings are able to eat but do not need to. I doubt that there is any need to defecate. But I don't know. Heavenly bodies must bloat terribly...
129
posted on
09/08/2006 1:21:37 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
To: concernedAmerican1
130
posted on
09/08/2006 1:22:07 PM PDT
by
jackieaxe
(Unsourced reporting is not reporting but a lie or a manipulation)
To: wagglebee
Funny, I had always believed that Christ made a new covenant. That doesn't make the Old Testament untruthful.
SD
To: SoothingDave
No, but Protestants have long used Old Testament laws about consuming blood to negage Transubstantiation.
132
posted on
09/08/2006 1:25:40 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
No, but Protestants have long used Old Testament laws about consuming blood to negage Transubstantiation. I know that, but could argue my way out of that one. ;-)
The point is the Bible identifies blood with life. The idea of a bloodless Risen Savior is comical.
SD
To: wagglebee
SD isn't talking about the New Covenant, he's talking about Biblical teaching. From age to age, God doesn't change and neither does His truth. Would you argue that there is no more wisdom to be found in the Psalms and Proverbs because there is a New Covenant?
The Torah and the Bible are a seemless recording of salvation history.
134
posted on
09/08/2006 1:27:34 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
To: concernedAmerican1
Dear Muslim Friends,
Your religion teaches that Mary is a revered figure. After all, hen you are "witnessing to Christians", you repeatedly bring up the idea that Mary and Jesus are both revered as a mother of prophet and a prophet in Islam.
So where's the outrage? Why isn't the UVa Muslim student association out in the streets demonstrating? Why aren't Imams issuing fatwas against the editor of this college paper?
Just some food for thought.
135
posted on
09/08/2006 1:27:47 PM PDT
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: SoothingDave
It seems that some believe that our Savior is "dead forever." Some of the stuff on this thread goes way beyond heresy, it has entered the realm of the bizarre.
136
posted on
09/08/2006 1:29:22 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: pgyanke
Yeah I know, I was just giving him a hard time.
137
posted on
09/08/2006 1:31:28 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
I know that from your other posts... I was just making the point for lurkers... God bless you.
138
posted on
09/08/2006 1:33:18 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
To: SoothingDave
"It's like they think Jesus is finite. "
I think it is a life of too many mind altering drugs.
They can't seem to grasp the concept that Jesus had to return in human form in order to fulfill scripture. To return in a spiritual form only proves that Jesus died. And to return in some bizzaro bloodless zombie form is just ridiculous.
To: Young Scholar
[ I don't think even many Protestants would agree with that one. ]
Oh! well... I don't believe in Protestants (they seem to be protesting nothing) or Roman Catholics because they are NOT Universal..
140
posted on
09/08/2006 2:28:23 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-153 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson