[3niner]

But he told the newspaper he kept quiet at the request of Patrick Fitzgerald, the prosecutor investigating the leak.

The real scandal here is Fitzgerald's behavior. He should be required to appear before Congress and testify about why he continued a sham investigation (costing millions of dollars, and forwarding a false story line in the media), when he knew the following, from almost the very beginning.

A: There was no crime.

B: The "leaker" was on the same side as Wilson (and Saddaam).

C: The "leak" was just a stupid accident.

[demkicker]

He should be required to appear before Congress and testify about why he continued a sham investigation (costing millions of dollars, and forwarding a false story line in the media), when he knew the following, from almost the very beginning.

Please refresh my memory, but did't Ken Starr have to go before Congress and explain his reasons for prosecuting?