[NormB]

1. If the government wanted people to think Al Qaeda brought the towers down, why would it look like a controlled demolition?
So you admit it looks like controlled demo?
2. If a cruise missile hit the Pentagon, what happened to the people on the missing plane?
You tell me.
3. Out of the thousands of people involved in an operation of this scale, did none of them lose a loved one?
What is your point.
4. If the government allowed the attacks to happen why isn't there one, even one, shred of evidence (citing another person who "thinks" the government was complicit is not evidence.)
The evidence is all over the place.
Your points make a great start of an argument FOR a conspiracy. I am not saying that one exists, but the evidence is out there and is compelling. Calling people "moonbats" and blindly refusing to look at anything that counters the mainstream opinion is ignorance. "Igrnorance is Strength" Have a nice day!

[cdga5for4]

He may be ignorant. You're just dumb.

[mtairycitizen]

The myth of the controlled demolition was created by a misquote from the president of CDI.

He claimed it did indeed look like a controlled demolition.
But he also explained why it was not in fact a controlled demolition.

I will get a link.

[aculeus]

Look at it this way: Not all kooks avoid posting on Free Republic.

[oldleft]

There is NO evidence. I've written fairly extensively about the physics involved in the collapse of the towers, and they came down exactly as would be expected if a plane slammed into them the way that happened. No one has produced a computer model or anything else that would suggest otherwise. There is simply no evidence of a controlled demolition.

Second, no one can prove a negative. The burden of proof in law and science is on the theorist or accuser. "You tell me" and "what is your point" isn't an argument. My point was, to which I received no answer, was that it's more than likely that in an operation of the scale people involved would be killing family members in the process.

Ignorance is the basis for any of these argument, and I'll have a logical debate with anyone about them.

[olderwiser]

"I am not saying that one exists..."

Why not, Norm? Don't you have the guts to admit your conviction, based on all that "compelling evidence" out there?

Come on. Just say it. President Bush (and Cheney, Rove, Rummy et al) masterminded 9-11.

[mtairycitizen]

2. If a cruise missile hit the Pentagon, what happened to the people on the missing plane?
You tell me.


Sorry it is not that easy.
When you claim something, the burden of proof is on the
person making the claim. Except if you are Dan Rather, who when using fake documents, thought that the burden was to proove the documents were false.

Liberals change the rules again.
Nice try though

[Trailerpark Badass]

2. If a cruise missile hit the Pentagon, what happened to the people on the missing plane?

You tell me.

They died, in the plane crash.

Dumbass.

[Admin Moderator]

Moonbats, crap, sayonara.

[WoodstockCat]

Hey Norm, are you aware that DNA evidence at the Pentagon crash site matched Flight 77 passengers?
Care to explain that one?

[Mad Dash]

1. If the government wanted people to think Al Qaeda brought the towers down, why would it look like a controlled demolition?

P So you admit it looks like controlled demo?

2. If a cruise missile hit the Pentagon, what happened to the people on the missing plane?

You tell me.

3. Out of the thousands of people involved in an operation of this scale, did none of them lose a loved one?

What is your point.

4. If the government allowed the attacks to happen why isn't there one, even one, shred of evidence (citing another person who "thinks" the government was complicit is not evidence.)

The evidence is all over the place.

Your points make a great start of an argument FOR a conspiracy. I am not saying that one exists, but the evidence is out there and is compelling. Calling people "moonbats" and blindly refusing to look at anything that counters the mainstream opinion is ignorance. "Igrnorance is Strength" Have a nice day!

ROFLOL! NormB, you proved oldleft's point so perfectly! I throughly enjoyed it..ROFLOL!

[oh8eleven]

NormB
Since 2003-07-29
"This account has been banned or suspended."

Calling people "moonbats" and blindly refusing to look at anything that counters the mainstream opinion is ignorance.
Shucks, our own in-house moonbat got shot down.