Ah, yes! You are talking about creationists!
I don't believe that lying, pretension, false-bravado belong exclusively to any group, or domain; and that members of all groups/types/etc. are guilty in some way or another of one of these improper uses of internet technology.
I still don't understand the gap between the so-called creos and evos.
There would be NO EVOLUTION if there were no CREATION in the first place.
Just because there was CREATION does not mean there can be no EVOLUTION.
IN THE BEGINNING, GOD CREATED....
Everything afterward is EVOLUTION.
It couldn't be any less complex.
Creatures evolve based on what it takes to SURVIVE. Not all are successful, it must be noted.
God CREATED the form of LIFE. The concept, the will. We are all made up of a single cell creature that has this WILL, this fantastic ability to ADAPT in order to survive.
It is an EUKARYOTE. You ARE a collection of EUKARYOTES and so is every other creature on the EARTH.
There are creatures in the ocean that live part of their life as a plant, with roots in the ocean bottom. When necessary, they 'pull up their roots' and transform into a 'snakelike' creature and swim away with the current.
PLANT or ANIMAL?????
So, the RULES of EVOLUTION or RULES of CREATION are manmade rules(theories) and do not really apply nor explain the full truth.
Even those who theorize that complex life forms evolved from simpler life forms must admit that somewhere (IN THE BEGINNING) that simpler life form had to be 'created'.
The real argument seems to be whether there was "GOD" that did the creation or whether the simpler life form "created" itself.
There would seem to be an inherent logic problem in trying to prove the second assertion, but who am I to argue?????