Skip to comments.
Tucker Carlson Gives David Brock a Beat Down (Path to 9/11)
NRO Media ^
Posted on 09/07/2006 1:51:12 PM PDT by hipaatwo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: Gordongekko909
just saw the twerp on Fox Julian Epstein I think was Brock's squeeze.
41
posted on
09/07/2006 2:31:50 PM PDT
by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: Gordongekko909
"Jamie Gorelick...That would just be nasty."
What this witch did to our country, our government, is way beyond nasty, no matter how you pronounce her. She should be shot for treason.
42
posted on
09/07/2006 2:37:18 PM PDT
by
el_texicano
(Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots all)
To: Jack Black
I'm willing to bet that the fact that he was a conservative journalist caused him a lot more problems as a gay man.
43
posted on
09/07/2006 2:38:23 PM PDT
by
AmishDude
(`[N]on-state actors' can project force around the world more easily than Canada". -- Mark Steyn)
To: boomop1
brock doesn't have gal pals - unless you mean the kind of gals you hang around with and talk about how cute Brad Pitt is. Brock is a rump rangler. but that doesn't mean he wasn't doing, or being done, by somebody in the clinton WH. it certainly was a target rich environment for that kind of thing.
44
posted on
09/07/2006 2:38:42 PM PDT
by
bpjam
(Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
To: Cincinna
" No "gal pal" for the odious Brock.
He outed himself as a "Gay American".
Frank Rich of the New York Times caused Brock to panic when writing about his best seller, the Real Anita Hill. Rich referred to Brock as misogynistic and Brock knew Rich had his number. He took the initiative and confessed to the Washington Post that he was gay. It was news to me, but apparently not to others associated with the American Spectator.
To: bpjam
I meant it as his kind of gal pal or he may be the gal see post 41 I believe it this nitwit who got to Brock. I always knew he was a fruit cake.
46
posted on
09/07/2006 2:41:57 PM PDT
by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: hipaatwo
Well it's about time, thanks for letting us know! A rare moment for MSNBC:)
Don't forget- Rush on CatieBroadcastingNetwork tonight!
47
posted on
09/07/2006 2:44:47 PM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
To: hipaatwo
Sandy Berger DID prevent the attack on bin Laden, but it wasn't a personal action. He wanted to get Clinton's approval before it occurred and they couldn't find Clinton for over an hour. Who knows what Clinton was doing. Anyway according to some colonel's eyewitness account, when Clinton did come on line, he kept asking so many question that the window was shut. And then later, the country became deadlocked in the post election drama.
48
posted on
09/07/2006 2:44:55 PM PDT
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?")
To: rmgatto; BW2221
Add me to the list. I can forgive Tucker's frequent boneheadedness because he's witty, but not Scarborough's - he's just irredeemably dumb, not worth the 2 cents of electricity it takes to run the TV when he's on. But I missed this smackdown darn it!
49
posted on
09/07/2006 2:50:06 PM PDT
by
leilani
To: MplsSteve
I'm not trying to go off-subject here - but I thought Tucker Carlson always wore a bowtie? I hate bowties. Did he give up on them? Anyone?Yes. He started off just having it rakishly loose at the end of his show. Now he's dropped the bowtie thing completely. No more bowties. It's open collar all the time.
To: Jack Black
No. But he plays one on TV!
51
posted on
09/07/2006 2:51:47 PM PDT
by
paddles
To: hipaatwo
what? no bow-tie in that pic?
52
posted on
09/07/2006 2:53:24 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: hipaatwo
all in all, a nice healthy butt kicking on somebody who richly deserved it.
53
posted on
09/07/2006 2:55:17 PM PDT
by
bpjam
(Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
To: Tulsa Ramjet
Sandy Berger DID prevent the attack on bin Laden, but it wasn't a personal action. He wanted to get Clinton's approval before it occurred and they couldn't find Clinton for over an hour. Who knows what Clinton was doing. Anyway according to some colonel's eyewitness account, when Clinton did come on line, he kept asking so many question that the window was shut.
ABC ought to put a trailer on the show stating Berger's theft of the secret documents during the 911 hearings and state as of today it has not been revealed what was in the documents
54
posted on
09/07/2006 3:06:28 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: bpjam
Wow, Dave. You might want to put some ice on that.
I just wish Tucker would have asked Brock his organization's stance on Farenhite 911 and Bowling for Columbine.
To: Right Angler
And Spike Lee's recent Katrina propaganda piece as well.
56
posted on
09/07/2006 3:08:44 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: BW2221
I haven't seen this interview yet. To date, his best interview was with Jesse Jackson. He oughtright accused him of arranging all his arguments around race.
To: My2Cents
I think you left out the part about coming out of the closet.
To: hipaatwo
![Image hosted by Photobucket.com](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/chode6/chode.gif)
HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...
59
posted on
09/07/2006 3:49:21 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: 1rudeboy
Don't use the term "head-to-head" and David Brock in the same sentence, if you catch my drift.
60
posted on
09/07/2006 5:02:56 PM PDT
by
LS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson