Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

`Priced below Assessment'
Boston.com ^ | 9/07/2006 | Kimberly Blanton

Posted on 09/07/2006 11:33:38 AM PDT by ex-Texan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Consider this a tip. Sellers need to sell their houses. One answer is to price the home below its assessed value. If you live in a place that is subject to hurricane damage, prices are going to fall faster than in Boston. I have read reports saying home owners' insurance is very costly in Florida. Are assessed values and property taxes running a year behind in Florida, too? Perhaps this article may provide some people with a small clue. Check my FR page to see new photos. Or just click Google For the naysayers out there: "Nothing to see here. Time to move on."
1 posted on 09/07/2006 11:33:39 AM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

2 houses on our street (northern Virginia) on the market for months. They're now listed below are recently increased tax assessment.


2 posted on 09/07/2006 11:35:53 AM PDT by elc (Feeling the babywearing love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Show me a few "below assessment" properties in Northern VA and I'll buy you a beer.

We're still talking $300K for a 2 bedroom condo up here. $400K if you're intrested in Tyson's Corner.
3 posted on 09/07/2006 11:36:24 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (The investigation was a hoax. Fitz should be brought up on charges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elc

Oh really! Freepmail me. I'd love to hear where.


4 posted on 09/07/2006 11:37:02 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (The investigation was a hoax. Fitz should be brought up on charges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

42 Haxall Court, Sterling, Virginia

Started at $420k. Now lowered to $375k. 2006 Assessment is $378k. Not a big difference, but it is a bit unnerving if you live on that street and have seen several houses sit on the market.

But we're prepared to ride it out. We've only been in a year and planned being in around 5 years.


5 posted on 09/07/2006 11:47:18 AM PDT by elc (Feeling the babywearing love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elc

are = our


oops


6 posted on 09/07/2006 11:48:17 AM PDT by elc (Feeling the babywearing love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Show me a few "below assessment" properties in Northern VA and I'll buy you a beer.

I just saw a 4 bdrm 2 car garage SFH in Woodbridge for $350K. Must be super desperate ...

7 posted on 09/07/2006 11:48:56 AM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Nice attempt to hijack your own thread.

Florida = Gaining Population
Boston = Probably not, it's a cold misarable blue state.

Why don't you talk about Boston in a thread about Boston.


8 posted on 09/07/2006 11:51:21 AM PDT by rwilson99 (R) South Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Please note that MA has property taxes capped at $25 per $1000 of assessed value.

Public schools in MA are funded through property taxes, but to a large extent, a property tax increase cannot be approved if school want a funding boost. Taxes are maxed out and overrides are hard to come by. The way around that is to increase the assessment of the home values in a given town. This is one reason why assessments in MA are at or above any potential selling price.

I don't deny that prices are in decline, or that homes are staying on the market a bit longer -- but it is not shocking to me that homes are selling below assessment.

9 posted on 09/07/2006 11:51:50 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elc

"We've only been in a year and planned being in around 5 years."

If you're paying down principal on the note, this is sufficient time to show a profit on the sale, even if the market remains flat (less 6% commission for the realtor). I don't think it'll be flat more than a year or two at worst though, myself. Assuming a very minimal 2% per year average appreciation, that $375,000 will be around $406,000 four years from now. I know when I bought my first house, 13 years ago, the conventional wisdom was that you had to stay put for at least two years to break even.


10 posted on 09/07/2006 11:57:03 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

Thank for the tip. I'm really talking about national and regional trends. The article discussed Boston pretty well. Florida homeowners are discovering some local drawbacks. Hurricanes. Insurance. Property taxes. What about people paying much higher insurance rates only to discover that the insurer has denied the wind damage claim? Oh, well . . .


11 posted on 09/07/2006 12:00:00 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Your statement that MA property taxes are capped is totally wrong. The yearly higher reassessments by the local Dem Politicians and their henchmen, the assessors, is just another way to steal the home owners in MA blind. As the assessment go down, will the taxes go down. NO WAY!!!!
12 posted on 09/07/2006 12:03:15 PM PDT by NewEnglander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If house prices continue falling, assessments eventually have to follow. But ``the taxes will always go up," said Richard D. Simmons Jr., the assessor for Belmont,

The taxes will always go up. How nice.

13 posted on 09/07/2006 12:08:44 PM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewEnglander

Correct. The $25 cap is on the Mass. excise tax on cars.


14 posted on 09/07/2006 12:11:12 PM PDT by Mr_Peter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NewEnglander; Mr_Peter
Have you ever heard of Prop 2 1/2?

It's not about excise taxes for cars.

15 posted on 09/07/2006 12:15:01 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

In a few years, he might not even have to pay 6% to a broker. The trend seems to be lower commissions or negotiated commissions.


16 posted on 09/07/2006 12:16:22 PM PDT by Cecily (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Yes, I have. Prop 2 1/2 is a cap on the "increase" allowed EVERY YEAR. And...it can be over-ridden by a town vote. And it's not $25 per 1000. The $25 cap IS ABOUT CARS. Got anything else to add?


17 posted on 09/07/2006 12:19:05 PM PDT by Mr_Peter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Peter
Once upon a time there was no Proposition 2½.

Property taxes in what was then known as "Taxachusetts" were 81 percent above the national average and went up 5-6 percent, and once even 12 percent, a year.

Politicians had long ago instituted a state income tax to replace some of the property tax burden. Then they said that if the taxpayers would allow a sales tax, they could cut the property tax. Then they instituted a state lottery to reduce the property tax, so by 1980 we had an income tax, a 5 percent sales tax, a state lottery, and the third highest property taxes in the nation.

Finally the voters took matters into their own hands, putting Prop 2½ on the 1980 ballot and passing it by 59-41-percent margin. The auto excise rate was cut by almost two-thirds, a rental deduction was created, and two state mandates were repealed while future unfunded mandates were forbidden. These reforms went into effect almost immediately.

The following July 1, the beginning of all communities' fiscal year, the levy limit went into effect. Property taxes in communities whose rate was higher than 2.5 percent of fair market value were cut 15 percent a year until they reached that maximum-allowable rate.

That's from Barbara Anderson. Read the last sentence. The maximum-allowable rate for property taxes (without an override) is 2.5 percent, or $25 per $1000 of fair market value.

18 posted on 09/07/2006 12:22:49 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Sadly, I can attest to the seriousness of the real estate slowdown. I have had a condominium on the market in the Charlestown section of Boston for several months. It's a great place with a garden and a deeded parking space right near Bunker Hill, Old Ironsides and the Freedom Trail, but no one is buying right now. Sigh.


19 posted on 09/07/2006 12:28:58 PM PDT by whirleygirl (no longer Texasbound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

That trend existed in a seller's market. When the agent really has to work to move the listing, they're not going to discount their commission.


20 posted on 09/07/2006 12:29:15 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson