Skip to comments.
Senators Want Probe Of DIRECTV On HDTV Signals
TVPredictions.com ^
| September 6, 2006
| Phillip Swann
Posted on 09/07/2006 2:38:31 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: BigSkyFreeper
EchoStar says it will pay $100 million to local stations to settle the nine-year-old legal battle over 'distant' network TV signals. The local stations are concerned that EchoStar's subscribers will watch the national signals instead of their feeds.My local market refuses to be carried, so bite me Senators!
2
posted on
09/07/2006 2:39:36 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Leave my Dishnetwork alone.
3
posted on
09/07/2006 2:40:16 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: bmwcyle
I just checked, my Denver, LA and NYC networks are still there. I think DirecTV is doing this to get us Dish Network subscribers to switch. I ain't switchin'. I've been a loyal Dish Network subscriber since 1998.
4
posted on
09/07/2006 2:46:02 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: bmwcyle
Leave it to a couple of dingbat pols to bollux things up. I've finally got the network channels I want, even though I'm not supposed to have them. Three of those channels are from NH and I live in NH but I'm not supposed to have them because they are part of the "Boston" market area and I'm supposed to be in the Burlington, VT - Plattsburgh, NY area. Makes perfect sense to me. /s
5
posted on
09/07/2006 2:46:51 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
I started with Primestar, went to Direct when it bought out Primestar and have now had Dish for many years. And I ain't switching again neither! And there's no cable out here in the woods so that's not an option.
6
posted on
09/07/2006 2:49:12 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: Past Your Eyes
I asked a few years ago if I could switch to the Billings, Montana market (for Montana news), they said I couldn't, and I said I would want things left the way they are. Echostar agreed with my request and since then, hasn't turned those distant stations off. The market I am in (Minot/Bismarck, ND) two stations refuse to be carried, so Dish Network only carries one. I ain't paying $5.99 for one channel, but I am however paying $12.99 for three distant markets that have all 4 networks.
7
posted on
09/07/2006 2:51:37 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: Past Your Eyes
've finally got the network channels I want, even though I'm not supposed to have them.Echostar knows I have NY, LA, and Denver, but I have not told them to switch to what is considered my local market. They won't switch or turn them off without your approval. As long as your happy, I wouldn't say anything to them. :)
8
posted on
09/07/2006 2:55:51 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
The fact that nobody is watching the big three networks anymore has little to do with distribution channels and everything to do with the product.
9
posted on
09/07/2006 3:00:40 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: gridlock
The fact that nobody is watching the big three networks anymore has little to do with distribution channels and everything to do with the product.Network TV does still have value and viewers. I personally don't watch the network news, it's the only thing I refuse to watch. The biggest PLUS with having networks from clear across the country is "time shifting". If I miss an episode of '24' on WNYW-NY, I can time shift an hour later and watch it on KDVR-Denver, or three hours later on KTLA-LA.
10
posted on
09/07/2006 3:11:43 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
these senators on a last dutch effort to appear relevant?
11
posted on
09/07/2006 3:14:15 AM PDT
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: BigSkyFreeper
I wish government would stop trying to protect TV stations from competition. If I want to purchase a distant signal that's my money to do as I please. Basically local stations with the help of Big Brother and Nielsen {I think} became overlords of what was considered local viewing areas. This did not take into consideration such things as local terrains but rather used mileage radius formulas. The proof of no functional feel solely upon the consumer and local station managers had final say if you could watch distant network stations. I'm certain some how and some way government can mess this up yet even more than it already has.
12
posted on
09/07/2006 3:23:21 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Well, crap!!!!!
With these goobers messing with the sat companies only means one thing.....
MY SAT BILL WILL BE GOING UP!!!!!!
Thanks for nothing, MORONS!!!!!
My oldest son had a bumper sticker on his government notebook in high school that read "US Government Policy: If It Ain't Broke, Fix It 'til It Is!" Ain't it the truth!
13
posted on
09/07/2006 3:25:19 AM PDT
by
dirtbiker
(I've tried to see the liberal point of view, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$....)
To: cva66snipe
Local station's argue that local advertisers are getting the shaft from those of us like you and me who opt to subscribe to distant networks. That's mainly the reason why they wanted you and I to be denied the option of distant networks because Joe Blow's Ford/Mercury/Cadillac located "on the edge of town" ain't getting business from you and I. Even if Joe Blow's Ford/Mercury/Cadillac ads were being seen by me, the chances of me dropping in to see his show room clear across the state are slim to none.
14
posted on
09/07/2006 3:30:35 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
I get distant because even though I live 20 miles from the local towers terrain blocks the signal. The towers are south of me. I live on the north slope of a high ridge. The local station managers looked at their coverage maps which were simply radius maps and said MINE!!! They were the final say. To prove otherwise would cost you a lot of red tape and money having field signal strength readings etc done. Even then they could say NO IT MINE like spoiled brats. I couldn't see the local stations nor their advertisers anyway. They acted like clueless idiots when I told them I was only getting signals bounced off nearby ridges which produced several ghost images on the screen. No antenna is gonna fix that problem.
I went through this years ago and finally got distant signals after Direct TV made a deal with the locals. I live in a rural area and cable is not an option either.
15
posted on
09/07/2006 3:39:08 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Why does a "local" station have a say any way?
If you bought a book out of state, and brought it in state, would you have to pay the local book store a royalty fee before you read it? This is not a perfect analogy but I think it is like what the locals are asking for.
16
posted on
09/07/2006 3:42:00 AM PDT
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: cva66snipe
The nearest TV tower from me is about 131 miles away "as the crow flies", with hills and valleys in between. All I can receive is just a snowy picture and the faint "appearance" of sound in the white noise. This from a high-gain antenna on a 70 foot tall tower.
I subscribed to Dish Network, and the gal on the phone asked me if I had cable service within the last 90 days, and I said no and that I live 20 miles from the nearest town with cable.
17
posted on
09/07/2006 3:43:38 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: Mark was here
I know, it is goofy, and 9 times out of 10 the government doesn't know what the hell it's doing and mucks things up trying to find a solution.
18
posted on
09/07/2006 3:45:30 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
This is insane. One should be able to have a subscription to whichever programming they wish to watch.
19
posted on
09/07/2006 3:45:32 AM PDT
by
GW and Twins Pawpaw
(Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
To: BigSkyFreeper
I've been a loyal Dish Network subscriber since 1998.I just recently signed up, got their "everything" package. I can't believe I never signed up before. I adore it and would probably have a difficult time ever giving it up.
20
posted on
09/07/2006 3:48:07 AM PDT
by
Types_with_Fist
(I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson