Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy

Actually this article is from today. I suspect you're right that the opinion howver may be slightly dated in info, but not by much. It's got the general limitations pegged. As for 2-3 tiumes the number of SM-3s, that may be possible. But it remains a glaring fact that this is just grossly inadequate. We have 80 or so Aegis cruisers. And only just now three that can engage ballistic missiles?


8 posted on 09/06/2006 4:52:39 PM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross

The number eight comes to mind. Maybe that is the number on the way plus the ones already outfitted with the ABM system.


9 posted on 09/06/2006 4:54:39 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

Well, I suspect it's a lot more than slipping the missile in the VLS cell. I'm sure that the AEGIS radar & combat system needs a considerable face-lift to be capable of being anthing more than a 'shooter'.


11 posted on 09/06/2006 5:15:54 PM PDT by Tallguy (The problem with this war is the name... You don't wage war against a tactic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson